FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164  
165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   >>   >|  
wherever, if resolved into an equivalent Indicative, it would be historical; as,-- videor ostendisse quales dei essent, _I seem to have shown of what nature the gods are_ (ostendisse here corresponds to an Indicative, ostendi, _I showed_). 3. The Historical Present is sometimes regarded as a principal tense, sometimes as historical. Thus:-- Sulla suos hortatur ut forti animo sint, _Sulla exhorts his soldiers to be stout-hearted_; Gallos hortatur ut arma caperent, _he exhorted the Gauls to take arms_. 4. Conditional sentences of the 'contrary-to-fact' type are not affected by the principles for the Sequence of Tenses; as,-- honestum tale est ut, vel si ignorarent id homines, sua tamen pulchritudine laudabile esset, _virtue is such a thing that even if men were ignorant of it, it would still be worthy of praise for its own loveliness_. 5. In conditional sentences of the 'contrary-to-fact' type the Imperfect Subjunctive is usually treated as an Historical tense; as,-- si solos eos diceres miseros, quibus moriendum esset, neminem tu quidem eorum qui viverent exciperes, _if you called only those wretched who must die, you would except no one of those who live_. 6. In clauses of Result and some others, the Perfect Subjunctive is sometimes used as an historical tense. Thus:-- rex tantum motus est, ut Tissaphernem hostem judicarit, _the king was so much moved that he adjudged Tissaphernes an enemy_. This construction is rare in Cicero, but frequent in Nepos and subsequent historians. The Perfect Subjunctive in this use represents a result simply _as a fact without reference to the continuance of the act_, and therefore corresponds to an Historical Perfect Indicative of direct statement. Thus, judicarit in the above example corresponds to adjudicavit, _he adjudged_. To denote a result as _something continuous_, all writers use the Imperfect Subjunctive after historical tenses. 7. Sometimes perspicuity demands that the ordinary principles of Sequence be abandoned altogether. Thus: a) We may have the Present or Perfect Subjunctive after an historical tense; as,-- Verres Siciliam ita perdidit ut ea restitui non possit, _Verres so ruined Sicily that it cannot be restored_ (Direct statement: non potest restitui); ardebat Hortensius dicendi cupiditate sic, ut in nullo flagrantius studium viderim, _Hortensius burned so
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164  
165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
historical
 

Subjunctive

 

Perfect

 

Historical

 

corresponds

 
Indicative
 
principles
 

contrary

 
Verres
 

judicarit


adjudged

 

Imperfect

 
statement
 

result

 
Sequence
 

sentences

 
Hortensius
 
restitui
 

ostendisse

 

Present


hortatur

 

historians

 

subsequent

 

Tissaphernes

 

cupiditate

 

construction

 

Cicero

 

dicendi

 

frequent

 

viderim


studium

 
burned
 

clauses

 

Result

 

flagrantius

 
hostem
 

ardebat

 
Tissaphernem
 

tantum

 
simply

Sometimes
 

perspicuity

 
tenses
 
writers
 

continuous

 

demands

 
Siciliam
 

ordinary

 
abandoned
 

altogether