FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192  
193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   >>   >|  
es. 315. 1. Real questions of the Direct Discourse, upon becoming indirect, are regularly put in the Subjunctive; as,-- Ariovistus Caesari respondit: se prius in Galliam venisse quam populum Romanum. Quid sibi vellet? Cur in suas possessiones veniret, _Ariovistus replied to Caesar that he had come into Gaul before the Roman people. What did he (Caesar) mean? Why did he come into his domain?_ (Direct: quid tibi vis? cur in meas possessiones venis?) 2. Rhetorical questions, on the other hand, being asked merely for effect, and being equivalent in force to emphatic statements, regularly stand in the Infinitive in Indirect Discourse. Thus :-- quid est levius (lit. _what is more trivial_, = nothing is more trivial) of the Direct Discourse becomes quid esse levius in the Indirect. 3. Deliberative Subjunctives of the Direct Discourse remain unchanged in mood in the Indirect: as,-- quid faceret, _what was he to do?_ (Direct: quid faciat?) Imperative Sentences. 316. All Imperatives or Jussive Subjunctives of the Direct Discourse appear as Subjunctives in the Indirect; as,-- milites certiores fecit paulisper intermitterent proelium, _he told the soldiers to stop the battle for a little_. (Direct: intermittite.) a. The negative in such sentences is ne; as,-- ne suae virtuti tribueret, _let him not attribute it to his own valor!_ TENSES IN INDIRECT DISCOURSE. A. Tenses of the Infinitive. 317. These are used in accordance with the regular principles for the use of the Infinitive as given in Sec. 270. a. The Perfect Infinitive may represent any past tense of the Indicative of Direct Discourse. Thus:-- scio te haec egisse may mean-- _I know you were doing this_.(Direct: haec agebas.) _I know you did this_. (Direct: haec egisti.) _I know you had done this_. (Direct: haec egeras.) B. Tenses of the Subjunctive. 318. These follow the regular principle for the Sequence of Tenses, being Principal if the verb of _saying_ is Principal; Historical if it is Historical. Yet for the sake of vividness, we often find the Present Subjunctive used after an historical tense (_Repraesentatio_); as,-- Caesar respondit, si obsides dentur, sese pacem esse facturum, _Caesar replied that, if hostages be given, he would make peace_. a. For the sequence after the Perfect Infinitive, see Sec. 268, 2. CONDITIONAL SENTENCES IN INDI
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192  
193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Direct

 

Discourse

 

Infinitive

 

Caesar

 

Indirect

 

Subjunctives

 

Tenses

 
Subjunctive
 

levius

 

trivial


regular
 

Perfect

 

Principal

 

Historical

 
regularly
 
respondit
 

Ariovistus

 

questions

 

replied

 

possessiones


attribute

 

egisse

 

INDIRECT

 

accordance

 
represent
 

principles

 

TENSES

 
Indicative
 

DISCOURSE

 

principle


facturum

 

hostages

 

dentur

 

Repraesentatio

 

obsides

 

CONDITIONAL

 

SENTENCES

 

sequence

 
historical
 

follow


tribueret

 

egeras

 

agebas

 

egisti

 

Sequence

 

Present

 

vividness

 

Jussive

 
domain
 

people