FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  
ho were then the most noted [Greek: politikoi] at Athens. The meaning of the last question is made clear by a passage in the _De Oratore_[140], where Cicero speaks of the combined Academic and Peripatetic schools under that name. It may be with reference to the progress of the _Academica_ that in a later letter he expresses himself satisfied with the advance he has made in his literary undertakings[141]. During the whole of the remainder of his sojourn at Astura he continued to be actively employed; but although he speaks of various other literary projects, we find no express mention in his letters to Atticus of the _Academica_[142]. He declares that however much his detractors at Rome may reproach him with inaction, they could not read the numerous difficult works on which he has been engaged within the same space of time that he has taken to write them[143]. In the beginning of June Cicero spent a few days at his villa near Antium[144], where he wrote a treatise addressed to Caesar, which he afterwards suppressed[145]. From the same place he wrote to Atticus of his intention to proceed to Tusculum or Rome by way of Lanuvium about the middle of June[146]. He had in the time immediately following Tullia's death entertained an aversion for Tusculum, where she died. This he felt now compelled to conquer, otherwise he must either abandon Tusculum altogether, or, if he returned at all, a delay of even ten years would make the effort no less painful[147]. Before setting out for Antium Cicero wrote to Atticus that he had finished while at Astura _duo magna_ [Greek: syntagmata], words which have given rise to much controversy[148]. Many scholars, including Madvig, have understood that the first edition of the _Academica_, along with the _De Finibus_, is intended. Against this view the reasons adduced by Krische are convincing[149]. It is clear from the letters to Atticus that the _De Finibus_ was being worked out book by book long after the first edition of the _Academica_ had been placed in the hands of Atticus. The _De Finibus_ was indeed begun at Astura[150], but it was still in an unfinished state when Cicero began to revise the _Academica_[151]. The final arrangement of the characters in the _De Finibus_ is announced later still[152]; and even at a later date Cicero complains that Balbus had managed to obtain surreptitiously a copy of the fifth book before it was properly corrected, the irrepressible Caerellia having copi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Cicero
 

Academica

 

Atticus

 

Finibus

 
Tusculum
 

Astura

 
Antium
 

letters

 

literary

 

speaks


edition

 

controversy

 
syntagmata
 
abandon
 

altogether

 
conquer
 

compelled

 
returned
 

painful

 

Before


setting

 
effort
 

scholars

 

finished

 
announced
 

characters

 

complains

 

arrangement

 

revise

 

Balbus


managed

 

irrepressible

 
corrected
 

Caerellia

 
properly
 

obtain

 

surreptitiously

 

unfinished

 

reasons

 
adduced

Krische

 
Against
 

Madvig

 

understood

 

intended

 

convincing

 

worked

 

including

 

sojourn

 

remainder