FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291  
292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   >>  
ed of an _abbess_ in her face!" This was her first attempt at verse-making, and here's her last, from the French of Sully-Prudhomme: "If you but knew what tears, alas! One weeps for kinship unbestowed, In pity you would sometimes pass My poor abode! "If you but knew what balm, for all Despond, lies in an angel's glance, Your looks would on my window fall As though by chance! "If you but knew the heart's delight To feel its fellow-heart is by, You'd linger, as a sister might, These gates anigh! "If you but knew how oft I yearn For one sweet voice, one presence dear, Perhaps you'd even simply turn And enter here!" She was only just seventeen when she wrote them, and, upon my word, I think they're almost as good as the original! Her intimate friendship with Chucker-out, the huge St. Bernard, lasted for nearly both their lives, alas! It began when they both weighed exactly the same, and I could carry both in one arm. When he died he turned the scale at sixteen stone, like me. It has lately become the fashion to paint big dogs and little girls, and engravings of these pictures are to be seen in all the print-sellers' shops. It always touches me very much to look at these works of art, although--and I hope it is not libellous to say so--the big dog is always hopelessly inferior in beauty and dignity and charm to Chucker-out, who was champion of his day. And as for the little girls--_Ah, mon Dieu!_ Such pictures are not high art of course, and that is why I don't possess one, as I've got an aesthetic character to keep up; but why they shouldn't be I can't guess. Is it because no high artist--except Briton Riviere--will stoop to so easily understood a subject? A great master would not be above painting a small child or a big dog separately--why should he be above putting them both in the same picture? It would be too obvious, I suppose--like a melody by Mozart, or Handel's "Harmonious Blacksmith," or Schubert's Serenade, and other catchpenny tunes of the same description. _I_ was also very intimate with Chucker-out, who made more of me than he even did of his master. One night I got very late to Marsfield by the last train, and, letting myself in with my key, I found Chucker-out waiting for me in the hall, and apparently in a very anxious frame of mind, and extremely demonstrative, wanting
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291  
292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   >>  



Top keywords:

Chucker

 

pictures

 

master

 
intimate
 
beauty
 

possess

 
inferior
 

dignity

 

character

 

aesthetic


champion
 

hopelessly

 

libellous

 

touches

 

understood

 
description
 

Schubert

 

Blacksmith

 

Serenade

 
catchpenny

Marsfield

 
anxious
 

extremely

 

wanting

 

demonstrative

 

apparently

 

letting

 
waiting
 

Harmonious

 

Handel


Riviere

 

Briton

 

easily

 

artist

 

shouldn

 

subject

 

picture

 

obvious

 

suppose

 

Mozart


melody

 

putting

 

painting

 

separately

 

chance

 

delight

 
window
 

glance

 

fellow

 

linger