FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  
main argument. Time, however, according to Kant, differs from space in one important respect. It is the form not of outer but of inner sense; in other words, while space is the form under which we perceive things, time is the form under which we perceive ourselves. It is upon this difference that attention must be concentrated. The existence of the difference at all is upon general grounds surprising. For since the arguments by which Kant establishes the character of time as a form of perception run _pari passu_ with those used in the case of space, we should expect time, like space, to be a form under which we perceive things; and, as a matter of fact, it will be found that the only _argument_ used to show that time is the form of inner, as opposed to outer, sense is not only independent of Kant's general theory of forms of sense, but is actually inconsistent with it.[2] Before, however, we attempt to decide Kant's right to distinguish between inner and outer sense, we must consider the facts which were before Kant's mind in making the distinction. [2] B. 49 (b), M. 30 (b). See pp. 109-12. These facts and, to a large extent, the frame of mind in which Kant approached them, find expression in the passage in Locke's _Essay_, which explains the distinction between 'ideas of sensation' and 'ideas of reflection'. "Whence has it [i. e. the mind] all the materials of reason and knowledge? To this I answer, in one word, from experience.... Our observation, employed either about external, sensible objects, or about the internal operations of our minds, perceived and reflected on, by ourselves, is that which supplies our understandings with all the materials of thinking. These two are the fountains of knowledge...." "First, Our senses, conversant about particular sensible objects, do convey into the mind several distinct perceptions of things, according to those various ways, wherein those objects do affect them: and thus we come by those ideas we have of Yellow, White, Heat, Cold, Soft, Hard, Bitter, Sweet, and all those, which we call sensible qualities; which, when I say the senses convey into the mind, I mean, they, from external objects, convey into the mind what produces there those perceptions. This great source of most of the ideas we have, depending wholly upon our senses, and derived by them to the understanding, I call _sensation_." "Secondly, The other fountain, from which experience furnisheth the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

objects

 

convey

 

senses

 

things

 

perceive

 

perceptions

 
sensation
 

experience

 

materials

 
knowledge

external

 

distinction

 

argument

 

general

 
difference
 

reflected

 
perceived
 

fountain

 

thinking

 

supplies


understandings
 

depending

 

derived

 

observation

 

understanding

 
answer
 

employed

 

Secondly

 

internal

 

operations


wholly

 

Yellow

 

produces

 

qualities

 

Bitter

 
affect
 

source

 
conversant
 

furnisheth

 

distinct


fountains

 
expect
 

perception

 

matter

 

opposed

 

independent

 
theory
 

character

 
establishes
 
respect