FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  
and two cursive copies. Origen[553], and (long after him) Cyril, employed _both_ readings[554]. (II) But then, (as all must see) such a maimed exhibition of the text was intolerable. The balance of the sentence had been destroyed. Against [Greek: ho protos anthropos], St. Paul had set [Greek: ho deuteros anthropos]: against [Greek: ek ges]--[Greek: ex ouranou]: against [Greek: choikos]--[Greek: ho Kyrios]. Remove [Greek: ho Kyrios], and some substitute for it must be invented as a counterpoise to [Greek: choikos]. Taking a hint from what is found in ver. 48, some one (plausibly enough,) suggested [Greek: epouranios]: and this gloss so effectually recommended itself to Western Christendom, that having been adopted by Ambrose[555], by Jerome[556] (and later by Augustine[557],) it established itself in the Vulgate[558], and is found in all the later Latin writers[559]. Thus then, _a third_ rival reading enters the field,--which because it has well-nigh disappeared from Greek MSS., no longer finds an advocate. Our choice lies therefore between the two former:--viz. (a) the received, which is the only well-attested reading of the place: and (b) the maimed text of the Old Latin, which Jerome deliberately rejected (A.D. 380), and for which he substituted another even worse attested reading. (Note, that these two Western fabrications effectually dispose of one another.) It should be added that Athanasius[560] lends his countenance to all the three readings. But now, let me ask,--Will any one be disposed, after a careful survey of the premisses, to accept the verdict of Tischendorf, Tregelles and the rest, who are for bringing the Church back to the maimed text of which I began by giving the history and explaining the origin? Let it be noted that the one question is,--shall [Greek: ho Kyrios] be retained in the second clause, or not? But there it stood within thirty years of the death of St. John: and there it stands, at the end of eighteen centuries in every extant copy (including AKLP) except nine. It has been excellently witnessed to all down the ages,--viz. By Origen, Hippolytus, Athanasius, Basil, Chrysostom, Cyril, Theodotus, Eutherius, Theodore Mops., Damascene and others. On what principle would you now reject it?... With critics who assume that a reading found in [Symbol: Aleph]BCDEFG must needs be genuine,--it is vain to argue. And yet the most robust faith ought to be effectually shaken by the discovery that four
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

reading

 
maimed
 

Kyrios

 
effectually
 
choikos
 

Western

 

attested

 

Jerome

 
readings
 
anthropos

Athanasius
 

Origen

 

retained

 

question

 

clause

 

countenance

 

explaining

 

accept

 
Church
 
premisses

verdict

 

bringing

 

thirty

 

Tischendorf

 

survey

 

careful

 
Tregelles
 
origin
 

history

 
disposed

giving

 
excellently
 

assume

 
critics
 
Symbol
 

BCDEFG

 
reject
 

principle

 

genuine

 
shaken

discovery

 

robust

 

Damascene

 

extant

 

including

 

centuries

 
eighteen
 

stands

 

Chrysostom

 

Theodotus