FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724  
725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   >>   >|  
tatute of limitations, because considerations of public policy back of the rule are regarded as absent.[573] Indian Tribes Within the terms of article III, an Indian tribe is not a foreign State and hence cannot sue in the courts of the United States. This rule was applied in the case of Cherokee Nation _v._ Georgia,[574] where Chief Justice Marshall conceded that the Cherokee Nation was a State, but not a foreign State, being a part of the United States and dependent upon it. Other passages of the opinion specify the elements essential to a foreign State for purposes of jurisdiction, such as sovereignty and independence. NARROW CONSTRUCTION OF THE JURISDICTION As in cases of diversity jurisdiction, suits brought to the federal courts under this category must clearly state in the record the nature of the parties. As early as 1809 the Supreme Court ruled that a federal court could not take jurisdiction of a cause where the defendants were described in the record as "late of the district of Maryland," but were not designated as citizens of Maryland, and plaintiffs were described as aliens and subjects of the United Kingdom.[575] The meticulous care manifested in this case appeared twenty years later when the Court narrowly construed section 11 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, vesting the federal courts with jurisdiction where an alien was a party, in order to keep it within the limits of this clause. The judicial power was further held not to extend to private suits in which an alien is a party, unless a citizen is the adverse party.[576] This interpretation was extended in 1870 by a holding that if there is more than one plaintiff or defendant, each plaintiff or defendant must be competent to sue or liable to suit.[577] These rules, however, do not preclude a suit between citizens of the same State if the plaintiffs are merely nominal parties and are suing on behalf of an alien.[578] Clause 2. In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. The Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court AN AUTONOMOUS JURISDICTION Acting on the assumption that its existence is derived directly from the C
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724  
725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
jurisdiction
 

foreign

 

courts

 

United

 

Supreme

 

Jurisdiction

 
federal
 

JURISDICTION

 

record

 

parties


citizens
 

defendant

 

plaintiff

 
Maryland
 
plaintiffs
 
Nation
 

Indian

 
public
 

Cherokee

 

States


liable

 

regarded

 

nominal

 

competent

 

preclude

 
adverse
 

interpretation

 
extended
 

citizen

 

extend


private

 

Tribes

 

holding

 

Within

 
absent
 

Clause

 
Congress
 

Original

 

Regulations

 

Exceptions


AUTONOMOUS

 

directly

 

derived

 
existence
 

Acting

 
assumption
 
appellate
 

mentioned

 
affecting
 
Ambassadors