FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762  
763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   >>   >|  
258 U.S. 126 (1922). [166] Ex parte Levitt, 302 U.S. 633 (1937). _See_, however, Massachusetts State Grange _v._ Benton, 272 U.S. 525 (1926), where the Supreme Court, though affirming the dismissal of a suit to enjoin a day-light-saving statute, nonetheless, sustained the jurisdiction of the district court to entertain the suit. [167] Alabama Power Co. _v._ Ickes, 302 U.S. 464, 480-481 (1938). [168] 333 U.S. 203 (1948). [169] 342 U.S. 429 (1952). _See_ p. 763 (Amendment I). [170] 6 Wall. 50, 64 (1868). _See also_ State of Mississippi _v._ Johnson, 4 Wall. 475 (1867). [171] 6 Wall. at 76. [172] 262 U.S. 447 (1923). [173] 42 Stat. 224 (1921). [174] 262 U.S. 447, 484-485. _See also_ New Jersey _v._ Sargent, 269 U.S. 328, 338-340 (1926), where the Court refused jurisdiction of a suit to enjoin the federal water power act because of its effect on the conservation of potable waters in New Jersey. A similar situation arose in Arizona _v._ California, 283 U.S. 423, 450 (1931), where the Court declined to take jurisdiction of an injunction suit to restrain the Secretary of the Interior and the five States of the Colorado River Compact from constructing Boulder Dam. [175] Georgia _v._ Pennsylvania R. Co., 324 U.S. 439 (1945). [176] Missouri _v._ Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920). [177] Georgia _v._ Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U.S. 230 (1907). [178] Alabama State Federation of Labor _v._ McAdory, 325 U.S. 450, 461 (1945). [179] Giles _v._ Harris, 189 U.S. 475, 486 (1903). [180] 258 U.S. 158 (1922). [181] Ibid. 162. [182] 297 U.S. 288, 324 (1936). [183] 274 U.S. 488 (1927). [184] Ashwander _v._ Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 324 (1936). [185] 283 U.S. 423 (1931). [186] 330 U.S. 75 (1947). [187] Ibid. 89-91. Justices Black and Douglas wrote separate dissents, but each contended that the controversy was justiciable. Justice Douglas could not agree that the men should violate the act and lose their jobs in order to test their rights. [188] Ex parte Steele, 162 F. 694, 701 (1908). [189] Pennsylvania _v._ Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 13 How. 518 (1852); United States _v._ Chambers, 291 U.S. 217 (1934); Mills _v._ Green, 159 U.S. 651 (1895); United States _v._ Evans, 213 U.S. 297 (1909). [190] Mills _v._ Green, 159 U.S. 651 (1895). This case came to the Supreme Court on appeal from a decree of the circuit court of appeals dissolving an injunction restraining certain regis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762  
763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

jurisdiction

 

States

 
United
 

Douglas

 

Jersey

 

Tennessee

 

Georgia

 
injunction
 

Pennsylvania

 

Alabama


Supreme

 

enjoin

 

Ashwander

 

appeal

 
Valley
 

decree

 

McAdory

 

Federation

 

Copper

 

Authority


dissolving

 

appeals

 
restraining
 
Harris
 
circuit
 

rights

 
violate
 

Steele

 
Bridge
 
Belmont

Wheeling
 

Justices

 
Chambers
 
separate
 

justiciable

 

Justice

 
controversy
 
dissents
 

contended

 
Interior

Amendment

 

Johnson

 

Mississippi

 

Grange

 

Massachusetts

 

Benton

 
Levitt
 

affirming

 
district
 

sustained