FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772  
773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   >>   >|  
that of an inferior act of legislation which, transcending the Constitution, is of no effect and binding on no one. This is not the exercise of a substantive power to review and nullify acts of Congress, for no such substantive power exists. It is simply a necessary concomitant of the power to hear and dispose of a case or controversy properly before the court, to the determination of which must be brought the test and measure of the law." Adkins _v._ Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525, 544 (1923). In United States _v._ Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 62 (1936), Justice Roberts for the Court reduced judicial review to very simple terms when he declared that when an act is challenged as being unconstitutional, "the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty,--to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former." [270] Note, for example, the following statement of Chief Justice Marshall: "Judicial power, as contradistinguished from the power of the laws, has no existence. Courts are the mere instruments of the law, and can will nothing." Osborn _v._ Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 866 (1824). Note also the assertion of Justice Roberts: "All the court does, can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question. The only power it has, if such it may be called, is the power of judgment. This court neither approves nor condemns any legislative policy. Its delicate and difficult office is to ascertain and declare whether the legislation is in accordance with, or in contravention of, the Constitution; and, having done that, its duty ends." United States _v._ Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 62-63 (1936). [271] Chicago & Grand Trunk R. Co. _v._ Wellman, 143 U.S. 339, 345 (1892). [272] Ibid. _See also_ Muskrat _v._ United States, 219 U.S. 346 (1911); Massachusetts _v._ Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923); Alabama State Federation of Labor _v._ McAdory, 325 U.S. 450 (1945); United Public Workers of America _v._ Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75 (1947); Fleming _v._ Rhodes, 331 U.S. 100, 104 (1947) [273] Rescue Army _v._ Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 331 U.S. 549, 568-575 (1947). _See also_ Alma Motor Co. _v._ Timken-Detroit Axle Co., 329 U.S. 129 (1946); Spector Motor Service _v._ McLaughlin, 323 U.S. 101, 105 (1944); Coffman _v._ Breeze Corporations, 323 U.S. 316, 324-325 (1945); Carter _v._ Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S. 238, 325 (1936); Siler _
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772  
773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

United

 

States

 
Justice
 

Constitution

 

Butler

 

judgment

 

Roberts

 
judicial
 

challenged

 

Carter


legislation

 

substantive

 

review

 

Wellman

 
Mellon
 

Muskrat

 

Massachusetts

 

difficult

 

office

 

ascertain


declare

 

delicate

 
legislative
 
policy
 
accordance
 

Chicago

 
contravention
 

Spector

 
Service
 
condemns

McLaughlin
 

Detroit

 
Angeles
 
Municipal
 

Timken

 

Rescue

 
Public
 
Workers
 

McAdory

 
Federation

Corporations

 

Breeze

 

Fleming

 

Rhodes

 

Coffman

 

America

 
Mitchell
 

Alabama

 
Hospital
 

Children