FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782  
783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   >>   >|  
gress by the Longshoremen's Act accepted the Jensen line of demarcation between State and federal jurisdiction, had proceeded to hold that, in shadowy cases where the claimant was in a twilight zone he was entitled to recover under the State statute in the absence of federal administrative action under the Longshoremen's Act on the ground of its constitutionality. In brief it would seem that in shadowy cases a claimant may elect either a federal court applying the Longshoremen's Act or a State forum applying the State compensation law. [399] 317 U.S. 219, 259. [400] 21 Wall. 558 (1875). [401] Ibid. 572. [402] Ibid. 574-575. [403] The "Lottawanna," 21 Wall. 558, 577. [404] In re Garnett, 141 U.S. 1, 12 (1891). [405] Ibid. 14. [406] 244 U.S. 205, 215 (1917), citing Butler _v._ Boston & Savannah S.S. Co., 130 U.S. 527 (1889), and In re Garnett, 141 U.S. 1 (1891). [407] 253 U.S. 149, 160 (1920). [408] 328 U.S. 1, 5 (1946), citing O'Donnell _v._ Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 318 U.S. 36, 40 (1943), and the cases cited therein. [409] Davis _v._ Department of Labor, 317 U.S. 249 (1942). [410] 2 Commentaries (2d ed., Boston, 1851), Sec. 1674. [411] Dugan _v._ United States, 3 Wheat. 172 (1818). [412] United States _v._ San Jacinto Tin Co., 125 U.S. 273 (1888); United States _v._ Beebe, 127 U.S. 338 (1888); United States _v._ American Bell Tel. Co., 128 U.S. 315 (1888). [413] United States _v._ San Jacinto Tin Co., 125 U.S. 273 (1888). [414] 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1331-1332. The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court does not extend to suits brought by the United States against persons or corporations alone. _See also_ Revised Statutes, Sec. 565, 629. United States _v._ West Virginia, 295 U.S. 463 (1935). [415] 136 U.S. 211 (1890). [416] United States _v._ Texas, 143 U.S. 621 (1892). [417] Ibid. 642-646. This suit, it may be noted, was specifically authorized by the act of Congress of May 2, 1890, providing for a temporary government for the Oklahoma territory to determine the ownership of Greer County. 26 Stat. 81, 92, Sec. 25. [418] United States _v._ Minnesota, 270 U.S. 181 (1926). For an earlier suit against a State by the United States, _see_ United States _v._ Michigan, 190 U.S. 379 (1903). [419] 295 U.S. 463, 471-475 (1935). [420] United States _v._ Utah, 283 U.S. 64 (1931). [421] United States _v._ California, 332 U.S. 19 (1947). [422] United States _v._ Louisiana, 339
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782  
783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

United

 
Longshoremen
 

federal

 

Garnett

 

applying

 

citing

 
Boston
 

Jacinto

 

jurisdiction


shadowy

 

claimant

 

persons

 

corporations

 
brought
 

extend

 

Virginia

 

Statutes

 

Revised

 

American


Louisiana

 

California

 
original
 
Supreme
 
earlier
 

territory

 
determine
 

ownership

 
Oklahoma
 
government

providing
 

temporary

 
Minnesota
 
County
 

Congress

 

Michigan

 
specifically
 
authorized
 

compensation

 
Lottawanna

proceeded

 

twilight

 

demarcation

 

accepted

 

Jensen

 

ground

 
constitutionality
 

action

 
administrative
 

entitled