FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217  
218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   >>   >|  
South throw away a great moral advantage when it waged aggressive war upon the North? No doubt it was necessary at first, from the secession point of view, to "fire the Southern heart" by attacking Fort Sumter. And, also from that point of view, that attack was fully justifiable because that fort was in "Confederate" territory. The invasions of Maryland and Pennsylvania were far different, and much more so were the relentless guerrilla war waged in the border States, attended with horrible massacres like that of Lawrence, Kansas, which, though no one charges them to the government or generals of the South, were unavoidable incidents of that species of warfare; and the inhuman cruelties incidentally suffered by Union prisoners. It is true that the slavery question was a very powerful factor in our Civil War, and became more and more so as the war progressed. But opinion on that question at the North was very far from unanimous at the first, and it is a fair and important question how far the growth of sentiment in the free States in favor of emancipation was due to the slaveholders' method of carrying on the war. My desire here is to refer to these questions solely from the military point of view, and for the consideration of military students. The conditions upon which depends success or failure in war are so many,--some of them being more or less obscure,--that careful study of all such conditions is demanded of those who aspire to become military leaders. [( 1) See Thomas's despatch of 8 P. M., November 29, to Colonel H. C. Wharton, Wilson's staff officer: War Records, Vol. XLV, part I, p. 1146.] CHAPTER XIII Grant Orders Thomas to Attack Hood or Relinquish the Command-- Thomas's Corps Commanders Support Him in Delay--Grant's Intentions in Sending Logan to Relieve Thomas--Change of Plan before the Battle of Nashville--The Fighting of December 15--Expectation that Hood would Retreat--Delay in Renewing the Attack on the 16th--Hopelessness of Hood's Position--Letters to Grant and Sherman--Transferred to the East--Financial Burden of the War--Thomas's Attitude toward the War. The perilous character of the situation in Tennessee, in which it was left by Sherman's premature start for the sea and Thomas's tardy concentration of troops, wholly disappeared with the repulse of Hood at Franklin. There was no further obstacle to the concentration of Thomas's forces at Nashville, the organization and equipme
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217  
218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Thomas
 

military

 

question

 
Sherman
 
conditions
 
Attack
 

States

 

Nashville

 

concentration

 

Records


officer
 
Wharton
 

Wilson

 

CHAPTER

 

Franklin

 

Colonel

 

November

 

aspire

 

equipme

 

demanded


obscure
 

careful

 

organization

 
despatch
 

obstacle

 
forces
 
leaders
 

repulse

 

premature

 

Hopelessness


Renewing

 

Retreat

 
Expectation
 
Position
 

Tennessee

 
Financial
 

Attitude

 

Transferred

 

perilous

 

situation


Letters

 

character

 
December
 

Support

 
wholly
 
Intentions
 

Commanders

 

Burden

 
disappeared
 

Relinquish