sequences," was the first analysis of real
merit in any of the reviews.]
[Footnote 128: In his _Memoirs of an Ex-Minister_, Malmesbury makes but
three important references to the Civil War in America.]
[Footnote 129: Adams, _Charles Francis Adams_, p. 165.]
[Footnote 130: Dodd, _Jefferson Davis_, pp. 227-8.]
[Footnote 131: _Ibid._]
[Footnote 132: It was generally whispered in Southern political circles
that Davis sent Yancey abroad to get rid of him, fearing his
interference at home. If true, this is further evidence of Davis'
neglect of foreign policy.]
[Footnote 133: Du Bose, _Yancey_, p. 604.]
[Footnote 134: Adams, _Charles Francis Adams_, pp. 149-51.]
[Footnote 135: Possibly the best concise statement of the effect on the
North is given in Carl Schurz, _Reminiscences_, Vol. II, p. 223. Or see
my citation of this in _The Power of Ideals in American History_, ch. I,
"Nationality."]
[Footnote 136: Hansard, 3rd. Ser., Vol. CLXII, pp. 1207-9.]
[Footnote 137: See _ante_, p. 60.]
[Footnote 138: _U.S. Messages and Documents, 1861-62_, pp. 83-4. Dallas
to Seward, May 2, 1862.]
[Footnote 139: An error. Mann did not arrive in London until May 15. Du
Bose, _Yancey_, p. 604.]
[Footnote 140: Richardson, _Messages and Papers of the Confederacy_,
Vol. II, p. 34. This report also shows that Mann was not present at the
first interview with Russell.]
[Footnote 141: F.O., America, Vol. 755, No. 128, Russell to Lyons, May
11, 1861. This document is marked "Seen by Lord Palmerston and the
Queen." The greater and essential part has been printed in
_Parliamentary Papers, 1862, Lords_, Vol. XXV. "Correspondence on Civil
War in United States." No. 33.]
[Footnote 142: Du Bose, _Yancey_, p. 604.]
[Footnote 143: Lyons Papers. The copy of the Memorandum sent to Lyons is
undated, but from Russell's letter to Lyons of May 4, in which it was
enclosed, it is presumable that the date of May 3 for the Memorandum
is correct.]
[Footnote 144: _Ibid._, Russell to Lyons, May 4, 1861.]
[Footnote 145: F.O., Am., Vol. 755, No. 121, Russell to Lyons, May 6,
1861.]
[Footnote 146: It is to be remembered that the United States had given
no notice of the existence of a state of war.]
[Footnote 147: In diplomatic usage official notification of neutrality
to a belligerent has varied, but Russell's letters show him to have
appreciated a peculiar delicacy here.]
[Footnote 148: F.O., France, Vol. 1376, No. 553. Draft. Pr
|