FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278  
279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   >>   >|  
. But Germany was perhaps 80% self-supporting, was well supplied with minerals and munitions, and could count on trade through neutral states on her frontiers. Her shallow, well-protected North Sea coast-line gave her immunity from naval attack and opportunity to choose the moment in which to throw her utmost strength into a sortie. So long as her fleet remained intact, it controlled the Baltic by virtue of an interior line through the Kiel Canal, thus providing a strangle hold on Russia and free access to northern neutrals. Only by dangerous division of forces, or by leaving the road to England and the Atlantic open, could the British fleet enter the Baltic Sea. England it is true had a superior navy (perhaps less superior than was commonly thought), and a position of singular advantage between Germany and the overseas world. But for her the maintenance of naval superiority was absolutely essential. An effective interference with her sea communications would quickly put her out of the war. The importance (for Germany as well as for England) of preserving their main fighting fleets, may explain the wariness with which they were employed. Instead of risking them desperately, both sides turned to commerce warfare--the Western Powers resorting to blockade and the Germans to submarines. Each of these forms of warfare played a highly important part in the war, and the submarine campaign in particular, calling for new methods and new instruments, seems almost to have monopolized the naval genius and energies of the two groups of belligerents. It may be noted, however, that but for the cover given by the High Seas Fleet, the submarine campaign could hardly have been undertaken; and but for the Grand Fleet, it would have been unnecessary. The naval strength of the various belligerents in July, 1914, appears in the table on the following page.[1] [Footnote 1: From table prepared by U. S. Office of Naval Intelligence, July 1, 1916.] --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Great |Ger-| U.S. | | | | | |Britain|many|(1916)|France|Japan|Russia|Italy|Austria ---------------|-------|----|------|------|-----|------|-----|------- Dreadnoughts | 20 | 13 | 12 | 4 | 2 | .. | 3 | 3 ---------------|-------|----|------|------|-----|------|-----|------- Pre-dreadn'ts | 40 | 20 | 21 | 18 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 6 ---------------|---
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278  
279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

England

 

Germany

 
superior
 

Baltic

 

Russia

 

campaign

 

submarine

 

warfare

 

belligerents

 

strength


groups

 
energies
 
monopolized
 

frontiers

 
genius
 
states
 

neutral

 

submarines

 

Germans

 

blockade


Western

 

Powers

 

resorting

 

played

 

highly

 

calling

 

methods

 

shallow

 

important

 
protected

instruments

 

Austria

 
Dreadnoughts
 

Britain

 

France

 
dreadn
 

appears

 
munitions
 

undertaken

 
unnecessary

minerals

 

Office

 

Intelligence

 
supporting
 

supplied

 

Footnote

 
prepared
 

division

 

forces

 
leaving