* * * *
CHAPTER XXI.
ON MOODS.
s. 291. The Anglo-Saxon infinitive has already been considered.
Between the second plural imperative, and the second plural indicative,
_speak ye_, and _ye speak_, there is no difference of form.
Between the second singular imperative _speak_, and the second singular
indicative, _speakest_, there is a difference in form.
Still, as the imperative form _speak_ is distinguished from the indicative
form _speakest_ by the _negation_ of a character rather than by the
possession of one, it cannot be said that there is in English any
imperative mood.
s. 292. _If he speak_, as opposed to _if he speaks_, is characterized by a
negative sign only, and consequently is no true example of a subjunctive.
_Be_, as opposed to _am_, in the sentence _if it be so_, is a fresh word
used in a limited sense, and consequently no true example of a subjunctive.
It is a different word altogether, and is only the subjunctive of _am_, in
the way _puss_ is the vocative of _cat_.
The only true subjunctive inflection in the English language is that of
_were_ and _wert_, as opposed to the indicative forms _was_ and _wast_.
_Indicative._ | _Subjunctive._
_Singular._ | _Singular._ _Plural._
1. I was. | If I were. If we were.
2. Thou wast. | If thou wert. If ye were.
3. He was. | If he were. If they were.
* * * * *
CHAPTER XXII.
ON TENSES IN GENERAL.
s. 293. The nature of tenses in general is best exhibited by reference to
the Greek; since in that language they are more numerous, and more strongly
marked than elsewhere.
_I strike_, _I struck_.--Of these words, the first implies an action taking
place at the time of speaking, the second marks an action that has already
taken place.
These two notions of present and of past time, being expressed by a change
of form, are true tenses. If there were no change of form, there would be
no change of tense. They are the only true tenses in our language. In _I
was beating_, _I have beaten_, _I had beaten_, and _I shall beat_, a
difference of time is expressed; but as it is expressed by _a combination
of words_, and not _by a change of form_, no true tenses are constituted.
s. 294. In Greek the case is different. [Greek: Tupto] (typt[^o]) = _I
beat_; [Greek: etupton] (etypton) = _I was beat
|