FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  
simple infinitive; _to speak_, or _speak_ + _to_ = the Anglo-Saxon _to spr['e]canne_, an infinitive in the dative case. s. 422. _Convertibility._--In the English language, the greater part of the words may, as far as their form is concerned, be one part of speech as well as another. Thus the combinations _s-a-n-th_, or _f-r-e-n-k_, if they existed at all, might exist as either nouns or verbs, as either substantives or adjectives, as conjunctions, adverbs, or prepositions. This is not the case in the Greek languages. There, if a word be a substantive, it will probably end in -s; if an infinitive verb, in -ein, &c. The bearings of this difference between languages like the English and languages like the Greek will soon appear. At present, it is sufficient to say that a word, originally one part of speech (e.g., a noun), may become another (e.g., a verb). This may be called the convertibility of words. There is an etymological convertibility, and a syntactic convertibility; and although, in some cases, the line of demarcation is not easily drawn between them, the distinction is intelligible and convenient. s. 423. _Etymological convertibility._--The words _then_ and _than_, now adverbs or conjunctions, were once cases: in other words, they have been converted from one part of speech to another. Or, they may even be said to be cases, at the present moment; although only in an historical point of view. For the practice of language, they are not only adverbs or conjunctions, but they are adverbs or conjunctions exclusively. s. 424. _Syntactic convertibility._--The combination _to err_, is at this moment an infinitive verb. Nevertheless it can be used as the equivalent to the substantive _error_. _To err is human_ = _error is human_. Now this is an instance of syntactic conversion. Of the two meanings, there is no doubt as to which is the primary one; which primary meaning is part and parcel of the language at this moment. The infinitive, when used as a substantive, can be used in a singular form only. _To err_ = _error_; but we have no such form as _to errs_ = _errors_. Nor is it wanted. The infinitive, in a substantival sense, always conveys a general statement, so that even when singular, it has a plural power; just as _man is mortal_ = _men are mortal_. s. 425. _The adjective used as a substantive._--Of these, we have examples in expressions like the _blacks of Africa_--_the bitters and sweets of life_-
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215  
216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
infinitive
 

convertibility

 

adverbs

 
substantive
 
conjunctions
 
languages
 

moment

 

speech

 

language

 

present


singular
 
English
 

syntactic

 

primary

 

mortal

 

conversion

 

Nevertheless

 

practice

 

historical

 

exclusively


equivalent
 

combination

 

Syntactic

 
instance
 

adjective

 
plural
 
examples
 

sweets

 

bitters

 

Africa


expressions

 

blacks

 
errors
 
parcel
 

meaning

 
wanted
 

general

 

statement

 

conveys

 

substantival


meanings

 

called

 
existed
 

prepositions

 
substantives
 
adjectives
 

combinations

 

dative

 
simple
 

Convertibility