parts of England are named as if their population were
preeminently _Saxon_ rather than _Angle_; viz., Wes-sex ( = West _Saxons_),
Es-sex ( = East _Saxons_), Sus-sex ( = South _Saxons_), and Middle-sex, ( =
Middle _Saxons_).
Others are named as if their population were preeminently _Angle_ rather
than _Saxon_; thus, the counties of Norfolk and Suffolk once constituted
the kingdom of the East Angles, and even at the present moment, are often
spoken of as _East Anglia_.
s. 542. It is safe to say that the dialects of the English language do
_not_ coincide with the distribution of these terms. That parts of the
Angle differ from parts of the Saxon districts in respect to the character
of their provincialisms is true; but it is by no means evident that they
differ on that account.
Thus, that the dialect of Hampshire, which was part of Wes-sex, should
differ from that of Norfolk, which was part of East _Anglia_, is but
natural. There is a great space of country between them--a fact sufficient
to account for their respective characteristics, without assuming an
original difference of population. Between the _Saxons_ of Es-sex and the
_Anglians_ of Suffolk, no one has professed to find any notable difference.
Hence, no division of the English dialects into those of _Saxon_ or those
of _Angle_ origin, has been successful.
Neither have any peculiarities in the dialect of Kent, or the Isle of
Wight, verified the notion of the population for those parts having been
originally _Jute_.
Nor yet has any portion of England been shown by the evidence of its
dialects, to have been _Frisian_.
s. 543. Yet the solution of such problems is one of the great objects of
the study of provincial modes of speech.
s. 544. That _Jute_ characteristics will be sought in vain is the inference
from ss. 7-13.
That differential points between the _Angles_ and _Saxons_ will be sought
in vain is also probable.
On the other hand, differential points between the _Frisians_ and _Angles_
are likely to be discovered.
s. 545. The traces of the Danes, or Northmen, are distinct; the following
forms of local names being _prim[^a] facie_ evidence (at least) of Danish
or Norse occupancy.
a. The combination Sk-, rather than the sound of Sh-, in such names as
Skip-ton, rather than Ship-ton.
b. The combination Ca-, rather than Ch-, in such names as Carl-ton rather
than Charl-ton.
c. The termination -by ( = _town_, _habitation_, _occupancy_,
|