FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177  
178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   >>   >|  
manner of _wert_ from _were_, a second singular from _wit_ after the manner of _must_, a secondary praeterite from _wiss_, or finally, the form _wisse_, anterior to the operation of the euphonic process that ejected the -t. s. 317. In the phrase _this will do_ = _this will answer the purpose_, the word _do_ is wholly different from the word _do_, meaning _to act_. In the first case it is equivalent to the Latin _valere_; in the second to the Latin _facere_. Of the first the Anglo-Saxon inflection is _de['a]h_, _dugon_, _dohte_, _dohtest_, &c. Of the second it is _d['o]_, _dodh_, _dyde_, &c. I doubt whether the praeterite _did_, as equivalent to _valebat_ = _was good for_, is correct. In the phrase _it did for him_ = _it finished him_, either meaning may be allowed. In the present Danish they write _duger_, but say _duer_: as _duger et noget?_ = _Is it worth anything?_ pronounced _dooer deh note?_ This accounts for the ejection of the g. The Anglo-Saxon form _de['a]h_ does the same. s. 318. _Mind--mind and do so and so_.--In this sentence the word _mind_ is wholly different from the noun _mind_. The Anglo-Saxon forms are _geman_, _gemanst_, _gemunon_, without the -d; this letter occurring only in the praeterite tense (_gemunde_, _gemundon_), of which it is the sign. _Mind_ is, then, a praeterite form with a present sense; whilst _minded_ (as in _he minded his business_) is an instance of excess of inflection; in other words, it is a praeterite formed from a praeterite. s. 319. _Yode_.--The obsolete praeterite of _go_, now replaced by _went_, the praeterite of _wend_. Regular, except that the initial g has become y. s. 320. _Did_.--See s. 317. _Did_, from _do_ = _facio_, is a _strong_ verb. This we infer from the form of its participle _done_. If so the final -d is not the same as the -d in _moved_. What is it? There are good grounds for believing that in the word _did_ we have a single instance of the old _reduplicate praeterite_. If so, it is the latter d which is radical, and the former which is inflectional. * * * * * CHAPTER XXV. ON CONJUGATION. s. 321. Attention is directed to the following list of verbs. In the present English they all form the praeterite in -d or -t; in Anglo-Saxon, they all formed it by a change of the vowel. In other words they are _weak verbs that were once strong_. _Praeterites._ _English._
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177  
178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
praeterite
 

present

 

strong

 
English
 
instance
 
minded
 

inflection

 

formed

 

equivalent

 

wholly


phrase
 
meaning
 

manner

 

finally

 

excess

 

initial

 

replaced

 

obsolete

 

secondary

 

Regular


CONJUGATION
 

Attention

 

inflectional

 
CHAPTER
 

directed

 
Praeterites
 
change
 

radical

 

business

 

singular


participle

 

grounds

 
reduplicate
 
single
 

believing

 
Danish
 

purpose

 

allowed

 

finished

 

correct


valere

 

dohtest

 
facere
 

valebat

 
pronounced
 
gemunde
 

occurring

 

letter

 
gemunon
 

gemundon