FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207  
208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>   >|  
two tests, then, of the grammatical place of a pronoun, its _present power_ and its _original power_, are often conflicting. s. 396. In the English language the point of most importance in this department of grammar is the place of forms like _mine_ and _thine_; in other words, of the forms in -n. Now, if we take up the common grammars of the English language _as it is_, we find, that, whilst _my_ and _thy_ are dealt with as genitive cases, _mine_ and _thine_ are considered adjectives. In the _Anglo-Saxon_ grammars, however, _min_ and _thin_, the older forms of _mine_ and _thine_, are treated as genitives or possessives. s. 397. This gives us two views of the words _my_ and _thy_. a. They may be genitives or possessives, which were originally datives or accusatives; in which case they are deduced from the Anglo-Saxon _mec_ and _thec_. b. They may be the Anglo-Saxon _min_ and _thin_, _minus_ the final -n. Each of these views has respectable supporters. The former is decidedly preferred by the present writer. s. 398. What, however, are _thine_ and _mine_? Are they adjectives like _meus_, _tuus_, and _suus_, or cases like _mei_, _tui_, _sui_, in Latin, and _hi-s_ in English? It is no answer to say that sometimes they are one and sometimes the other. They were not so originally. They did not begin with meaning two things at once; on the contrary, they were either possessive cases, of which the power became subsequently adjectival, or adjectives, of which the power became subsequently possessive. s. 399. In Anglo-Saxon and in Old Saxon there is but one form to express the Latin _mei_ (or _tui_), on the one side, and _meus_, _mea_, _meum_ (or _tuus_, &c.), on the other. In several other Gothic tongues, however, there was the following difference of form: _Moeso-Gothic_ meina = _mei_ as opposed to meins = _meus_. theina = _tui_ -- theins = _tuus_. _Old High German_ m[^i]n = _mei_ -- m[^i]ner = _meus_. d[^i]n = _tui_ -- d[^i]ner = _tuus_. _Old Norse_ min = _mei_ -- minn = _meus_. thin = _tui_ -- thinn = _tuus_. _Middle Dutch_ m[^i]ns = _mei_ -- m[^i]n = _meus_. d[^i]ns = _tui_ -- d[^i]n = _tuus_. _Modern High German_ mein = _mei_ -- meiner = _meus_. dein = _tui_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207  
208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
adjectives
 

English

 

originally

 
Gothic
 
genitives
 
possessives
 

possessive

 

subsequently

 

present


grammars

 
language
 
German
 

things

 

meaning

 

Modern

 

contrary

 

meiner

 

answer


theins

 

theina

 
tongues
 

Middle

 

adjectival

 
express
 

difference

 
opposed
 
common

whilst

 

treated

 

considered

 

genitive

 

grammar

 
original
 
pronoun
 

grammatical

 
conflicting

department

 

importance

 

preferred

 

decidedly

 

supporters

 

writer

 
respectable
 

deduced

 
accusatives

datives