FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>   >|  
ent suggested by the term is _that a house is red_. By a parity of reasoning _a mad house_ should mean a _house that is mad_; and provided that each word retain its _natural meaning_ and its _natural accent_, such is the fact. Let a _house_ mean, as it often does, a _family_. Then the phrase, _a mad house_, means that the _house_, _or family_, _is mad_, just as a _red house_ means that the _house is red_. Such, however, is not the current meaning of the word. Every one knows that _a mad house_ means _a house for mad men_; in which case it is treated as a compound word, and has a marked accent on the first syllable, just as _L['i]mehouse_ has. Now, compared with the word _red house_, meaning a house of a _red colour_, and compared with the words _mad house_, meaning a _deranged family_, the word _m['a]dhouse_, in its common sense, expressed a compound idea; as opposed to two ideas, or a double idea. The word _beef steak_ is evidently a compound idea; but as there is no disparity of accent, it is not a compound word. Its sense is compound. Its form is not compound but double. This indicates the objection anticipated, which is this: viz., that a definition, which would exclude such a word as _beef steak_ from the list of compounds, is, for that very reason, exceptionable. I answer to this, that the term in question is a compound idea, and not a compound form; in other words, that it is a compound in logic, but not a compound in etymology. Now etymology, taking cognisance of forms only, has nothing to do with ideas, except so far as they influence forms. Such is the commentary upon the words, _treating the combination as a single term_; in other words, such the difference between a compound word and two words. The rule, being repeated, stands (subject to exceptions indicated above) thus:--_there is no true composition without either a change of form or a change of accent_. s. 360. As I wish to be clear upon this point, I shall illustrate the statement by its application. The term _tr['e]e-rose_ is often pronounced _tr['e]e r['o]se_; that is, with the accent at _par_. It is compound in the one case; it is a pair of words in the other. The terms _mountain ash_ and _mountain height_ are generally (perhaps always) pronounced with an equal accent on the syllables _mount-_ and _ash_, _mount-_ and _height_, respectively. In this case the word _mountain_ must be dealt with as an adjective, and the words considered as two. Th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

compound

 

accent

 

meaning

 

mountain

 
family
 
double
 

change

 

pronounced

 

compared

 

etymology


natural

 
height
 

treating

 

single

 
difference
 

combination

 
repeated
 
subject
 
composition
 

exceptions


stands

 

syllables

 
generally
 

considered

 

adjective

 
statement
 

application

 

illustrate

 
commentary
 
marked

treated
 

syllable

 
dhouse
 
deranged
 

colour

 

mehouse

 

current

 

reasoning

 
parity
 

suggested


provided

 
phrase
 

retain

 

common

 

expressed

 

taking

 

question

 

answer

 

reason

 

exceptionable