FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351  
352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   >>   >|  
[Footnote 741: _U.S. Messages and Documents_, 1862-3. Pt. I, pp. 165-168.] [Footnote 742: Adams, _A Crisis in Downing Street_, p. 389. First printed in Rhodes, VI, pp. 342-3, in 1899.] [Footnote 743: _Ibid._, p. 390.] [Footnote 744: See _ante_, p. 32.] [Footnote 745: Russell Papers. Stuart to Russell, July 21, 1862.] [Footnote 746: Lyons Papers. Lyons to Stuart, July 25, 1862.] [Footnote 747: Russell Papers. Stuart to Russell, Aug. 8, 1862. Stoeckl's own report hardly agrees with this. He wrote that the newspapers were full of rumours of European mediation but, on consultation with Seward, advised that any offer at present would only make matters worse. It would be best to wait and see what the next spring would bring forth (Russian Archives, Stoeckl to F.O., Aug. 9-21, 1862. No. 1566). Three weeks later Stoeckl was more emphatic; an offer of mediation would accomplish nothing unless backed up by force to open the Southern ports; this had always been Lyons' opinion also; before leaving for England, Lyons had told him "we ought not to venture on mediation unless we are ready to go to war." Mercier, however, was eager for action and believed that if France came forward, supported by the other Powers, especially Russia, the United States would be compelled to yield. To this Stoeckl did not agree. He believed Lyons was right (_Ibid._, Sept. 16-28, 1862. No. 1776).] [Footnote 748: _Ibid._, Aug. 22, 1862. Sumner was Stuart's informant.] [Footnote 749: _Ibid._, Sept. 26, 1862. When issued on September 22, Stuart found no "humanity" in it. "It is cold, vindictive and entirely political."] [Footnote 750: Palmerston MS. Russell to Palmerston, Aug. 24, 1862.] [Footnote 751: The ignorance of other Cabinet members is shown by a letter from Argyll to Gladstone, September 2, 1862, stating as if an accepted conclusion, that there should be no interference and that the war should be allowed to reach its "natural issue" (Gladstone Papers).] [Footnote 752: Russell Papers. Cowley to Russell. Sept. 18, 1862, fixes the date of Russell's letter.] [Footnote 753: Palmerston MS.] [Footnote 754: Walpole, _Russell_, II, p. 360.] [Footnote 755: _Ibid._, p. 361. Sept. 17, 1862.] [Footnote 756: Russell Papers. Cowley to Russell, Sept. 18, 1862. This is the first reference by Cowley in over three months to mediation--evidence that Russell's instructions took him by surprise.] [Footnote 757: Gladstone Papers.] [
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351  
352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Russell

 
Papers
 

Stuart

 

Stoeckl

 

mediation

 
Cowley
 

Gladstone

 
Palmerston
 
September

letter

 

believed

 

issued

 

France

 

humanity

 
action
 

supported

 

compelled

 

States

 

Sumner


forward

 

Powers

 
United
 

Russia

 
informant
 

Walpole

 
instructions
 

surprise

 

evidence

 
months

reference
 

natural

 

Cabinet

 

ignorance

 

members

 

political

 

Argyll

 

interference

 

allowed

 

conclusion


stating

 

accepted

 

vindictive

 
Southern
 
report
 

European

 

consultation

 

Seward

 

rumours

 
agrees