ular tenet that if a man becomes a
monk all his ancestors go to Heaven. See _Paraphrase of sacred Edict_,
VII.]
[Footnote 577: Japanese Emperors did the same, _e.g._ Kwammu
Tenno in 793.]
[Footnote 578: [Chinese: ]]
[Footnote 579: K'ang Hsi is responsible only for the text of the Edict
which merely forbids heterodoxy. But his son Yung Cheng who published
the explanation and paraphrase repaired the Buddhist temples at P'uto
and the Taoist temple at Lung-hu-shan.]
[Footnote 580: See Johnston, p. 352. I have not seen the Chinese text
of this edict. In Laufer and Francke's _Epigraphische Denkmaler aus
China_ is a long inscription of Kang Hsi's giving the history both
legendary and recent of the celebrated sandal-wood image of the
Buddha.]
[Footnote 581: This indicates that the fusion of Buddhism and Hinduism
was less complete than some scholars suppose. Where there was a
general immigration of Hindus, the mixture is found, but the Indian
visitors to China were mostly professional teachers and their teaching
was definitely Buddhist. There are, however, two non-Buddhist books in
the Chinese Tripitaka. Nanjio Cat. Nos. 1295 and 1300.]
[Footnote 582: It has been pointed out by Fergusson and others that
there were high towers in China before the Buddhist period. Still, the
numerous specimens extant date from Buddhist times, many were built
over relics, and the accounts of both Fa-hsien and Hsuan Chuang show
that the Stupa built by Kanishka at Peshawar had attracted the
attention of the Chinese.
I regret that de Groot's interesting work _Der Thupa: das heiligste
Heiligtum des Buddhismus in China_, 1919, reached me too late for me
to make use of it.]
[Footnote 583: The love of nature shown in the Pali Pitakas
(particularly the Thera and Theri Gatha) has often been noticed, but
it is also strong in Mahayanist literature. _E.g._ Bodhicaryavatara
VIII. 26-39 and 86-88.]
[Footnote 584: See especially Watters, _Essays on the Chinese
Language_, chaps, VIII and IX, and Clementi, _Cantonese Love Songs in
English_, pp. 9 to 12]
[Footnote 585: [Chinese: ]]
[Footnote 586: I cannot refrain from calling attention to the
difference between the Chinese and most other Asiatic peoples
(especially the Hindus) as exhibited in their literature. Quite apart
from European influence the Chinese produced several centuries ago
catalogues of museums and descriptive lists of inscriptions, works
which have no parallel in Hindu Ind
|