FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298  
1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   >>   >|  
r _v._ Reclamation District, 111 U.S. 701 (1884). [481] Butters _v._ Oakland, 263 U.S. 162 (1923). [482] Missouri P.R. Co. _v._ Western Crawford Road Improv. Dist., 266 U.S. 187 (1924). _See also_ Roberts _v._ Richland Irrig. Co., 289 U.S. 71 (1933) in which it was also stated that an assessment to pay the general indebtedness of an irrigation district is valid, even though in excess of the benefits received. [483] Houck _v._ Little River Drainage Dist, 239 U.S. 254 (1915). [484] Road Improv. Dist. _v._ Missouri P.R. Co., 274 U.S. 188 (1927). [485] Kansas City Southern R. Co. _v._ Road Improv. Dist., 266 U.S. 379 (1924). [486] Louisville & N.R. Co. _v._ Barber Asphalt Pav. Co., 197 U.S. 430 (1905). [487] Myles Salt Co. _v._ Iberia & St. M. Drainage Dist., 239 U.S. 478 (1916). [488] Wagner _v._ Leser, 239 U.S. 207 (1915). [489] Charlotte Harbor & N.R. Co. _v._ Welles, 260 U.S. 8 (1922). [490] Union Refrigerator Transit Co. _v._ Kentucky, 199 U.S. 194, 204 (1905). _See also_ Louisville & J. Ferry Co. _v._ Kentucky, 188 U.S. 385 (1903). [491] Carstairs _v._ Cochran, 193 U.S. 10 (1904); Hannis Distilling Co. _v._ Baltimore, 216 U.S. 285 (1910); Frick _v._ Pennsylvania, 268 U.S. 473 (1925); Blodgett _v._ Silberman, 277 U.S. 1 (1928). [492] New York ex rel. New York, C. & H.R.R. Co. _v._ Miller, 202 U.S. 584 (1906). [493] Wheeling Steel Corp _v._ Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 209-210 (1936); Union Refrigerator Transit Co. _v._ Kentucky, 199 U.S. 194, 207 (1905); Johnson Oil Ref. Co. _v._ Oklahoma ex rel. Mitchell, 290 U.S. 158 (1933). [494] Robert L. Howard, State Jurisdiction to Tax Intangibles: A Twelve Year Cycle, 8 Missouri Law Review 155, 160-162 (1943); Ralph T. Rawlins, State Jurisdiction to Tax Intangibles: Some Modern Aspects, 18 Texas Law Review 296, 314-315 (1940). [495] Kirtland _v._ Hotchkiss, 100 U.S. 491, 498 (1879). [496] Savings & L. Soc. _v._ Multnomah County, 169 U.S. 421 (1898). [497] Bristol _v._ Washington County, 177 U.S. 133, 141 (1900). [498] Fidelity & C. Trust Co. _v._ Louisville, 245 U.S. 54 (1917). [499] Rogers _v._ Hennepin County, 240 U.S. 184 (1916). [500] Citizens Nat. Bank _v._ Durr, 257 U.S. 99, 109 (1921). [501] Hawley _v._ Maiden, 232 U.S. 1, 12 (1914). [502] First Bank Stock Corp. _v._ Minnesota, 301 U.S. 234, 241 (1937). [503] Schuylkill Trust Co. _v._ Pennsylvania, 302 U.S. 506 (1938). [504] Harvester Co. _v._ Dept. of Taxation, 322 U.S. 435 (19
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298  
1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Improv

 

Kentucky

 
Louisville
 

Missouri

 

County

 

Review

 

Drainage

 
Intangibles
 

Refrigerator

 

Transit


Jurisdiction

 

Pennsylvania

 

Aspects

 

Modern

 
Oklahoma
 

Kirtland

 

Robert

 

Johnson

 

Howard

 

Twelve


Mitchell

 

Rawlins

 
Bristol
 
Minnesota
 
Maiden
 

Hawley

 
Harvester
 

Taxation

 
Schuylkill
 
Washington

Multnomah
 

Savings

 
Hennepin
 
Citizens
 

Rogers

 

Fidelity

 
Hotchkiss
 
excess
 

benefits

 
received

indebtedness

 

general

 

irrigation

 

district

 

Little

 

Kansas

 
Southern
 

assessment

 
Oakland
 

Butters