rel. Atty. Gen., 234
U.S. 199 (1914).
[1144] Tigner _v._ Texas, 310 U.S. 141 (1940), overruling Connolly _v._
Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 U.S. 540 (1902).
[1145] Standard Oil Co. _v._ Tennessee ex rel. Cates, 217 U.S. 413
(1910).
[1146] Carroll _v._ Greenwich Ins. Co., 199 U.S. 401 (1905).
[1147] Pacific States Box & Basket Co. _v._ White, 296 U.S. 176 (1935).
_See also_ Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36 (1873); Nebbia _v._ New
York, 291 U.S. 502, 529 (1934).
[1148] Pace _v._ Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883).
[1149] Collins _v._ Johnston, 237 U.S. 502, 510 (1915); Pennsylvania ex
rel. Sullivan _v._ Ashe, 302 U.S. 51 (1937).
[1150] McDonald _v._ Massachusetts, 180 U.S. 311 (1901). _See also_
Moore _v._ Missouri, 159 U.S. 673 (1895); Graham _v._ West Virginia, 224
U.S. 616 (1912).
[1151] Carlesi _v._ New York, 233 U.S. 51 (1914).
[1152] Ughbanks _v._ Armstrong, 208 U.S. 481 (1908).
[1153] Pennsylvania ex rel. Sullivan _v._ Ashe, 302 U.S. 51 (1937).
[1154] Finley _v._ California, 222 U.S. 28 (1911).
[1155] Minnesota _v._ Probate Court, 309 U.S. 270 (1940).
[1156] Pace _v._ Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883).
[1157] Francis _v._ Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947).
[1158] Skinner _v._ Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). _Cf._ Buck _v._ Bell,
274 U.S. 200 (1927). (Sterilization of defectives.)
[1159] Buchanan _v._ Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917).
[1160] Corrigan _v._ Buckley, 271 U.S. 323 (1926).
[1161] Shelley _v._ Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948). _Cf._ Hurd _v._ Hodge,
334 U.S. 24 (1948), where the Court held that a restrictive covenant was
unenforceable in the Federal Court of the District of Columbia for
reasons of public policy.
[1162] Plessy _v._ Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896). _Cf._ Morgan _v._
Virginia, 328 U.S. 373 (1946), where a State statute requiring
segregation of passengers on interstate journeys was held to be an
unlawful restriction on interstate commerce. _See also_ Hall _v._ De
Cuir, 95 U.S. 485 (1878), where a State law forbidding steamboats on the
Mississippi to segregate passengers according to race was held
unconstitutional under the commerce clause, and Bob-Lo Excursion Co.
_v._ Michigan, 333 U.S. 28 (1948), where a Michigan statute forbidding
discrimination was held valid as applied to an excursion boat operating
on the Detroit River; and Henderson _v._ United States, 339 U.S. 816
(1950), where segregation in a dining car operated by an interstate
railroad was held to violate a federal stat
|