FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   1341   1342   1343   1344   1345   1346   1347   1348   1349   1350   1351   1352  
1353   1354   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   >>   >|  
right of citizen to reside peacefully in the several States, and to have free ingress into and egress from such States. Authority to deal with the forcible eviction by a mob of individuals across State boundaries is exclusively within the power reserved by the Constitution to the States. [1228] Virginia _v._ Rives, 100 U.S. 313, 318 (1880); Strauder _v._ West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1880). [1229] Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 339, 344 (1880). [1230] United States _v._ Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883). _See also_ Baldwin _v._ Franks, 120 U.S. 678, 685 (1887). [1231] 325 U.S. 91 (1945). [1232] 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 242. [1233] No "opinion of the Court" was given. In announcing the judgment of the Court, Justice Douglas, who was joined by Chief Justice Stone and Justices Black and Reed, declared that the trial judge had erred in not charging the jury that the defendants must be found to have had the specific intention of depriving their victim of his right to a fair trial in accordance with due process of law, that this was the force of the word, "willfully," in section 20, and that any other construction of section 20 would be void for want of laying down an "ascertainable standard of guilt." To avoid a stalemate on the Court, Justice Rutledge concurred in the result; but, on the merits of the case, he would have affirmed the conviction. Justice Murphy announced that he favored affirming the conviction and therefore dissented. Justice Roberts, with whom Justices Frankfurter and Jackson were associated, dissented for reasons stated in the text. [1234] 100 U.S. 339, 346 (1880). [1235] 313 U.S. 299, 326 (1941). [1236] 325 U.S. 91, 114-116 (1945). _But see_ Barney _v._ City of New York, 193 U.S. 430, 438, 441 (1904). [1237] Ibid. 106-107. The majority supporting this proposition was not the same majority as the one which held that "State" action was involved. [1238] 341 U.S. 97 (1951). [1239] Ibid. 103-104. [1240] 342 U.S. 852. [1241] Ibid. 853-854. AMENDMENT 15 RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO VOTE Page Affirmative interpretation 1183 Negative application; the "Grandfather Clause" 1184 Application to party primaries 1185 Enforcement 1186 AMENDMENT 15.--RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO VOTE Amendment 15
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   1341   1342   1343   1344   1345   1346   1347   1348   1349   1350   1351   1352  
1353   1354   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Justice
 

States

 

Virginia

 

conviction

 

dissented

 

Justices

 

majority

 
section
 

CITIZENS

 

AMENDMENT


concurred

 

result

 

Rutledge

 

stalemate

 

reasons

 
affirming
 

Roberts

 
favored
 
announced
 

Murphy


Frankfurter

 

stated

 

merits

 

affirmed

 

Jackson

 

Affirmative

 

interpretation

 
Negative
 
primaries
 
Enforcement

Amendment

 

Application

 

application

 
Grandfather
 

Clause

 

Barney

 
standard
 
supporting
 

involved

 

action


proposition

 

United

 
Strauder
 

Harris

 

Franks

 

Baldwin

 

Constitution

 

egress

 

Authority

 

ingress