FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380  
1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   >>   >|  
Law could not override such exercise of state power. * * * [Since] the Sherman Law, * * *, can have no greater potency than the Commerce Clause itself, it must equally yield to state power drawn from the Twenty-first Amendment."[14] All other efforts to invoke the Twenty-first Amendment as a limitation upon the constitutional powers of the National Government, notably to invalidate the imposition, pursuant to the war power, of federal price controls on retail sales of liquors, have been equally abortive.[15] Notes [1] 299 U.S. 59 (1936). [2] 304 U.S. 401 (1938). [3] 305 U.S. 391 (1939). [4] 305 U.S. 395 (1939). [5] 299 U.S. 59, 62 (1936). [6] Ibid 63-64. In the three decisions rendered subsequently, the Court merely restated these conclusions. The contention that discriminatory regulation of imported liquors violated the due process clause was summarily rejected in Indianapolis Brewing Co. _v._ Liquor Commission, 305 U.S. 391, 394 (1939). [7] 308 U.S. 132 (1939). [8] Ibid. 138. [9] 314 U.S. 390 (1941). [10] 321 U.S. 131 (1944). _See also_ Cartlidge _v._ Rainey, 168 F. (2d) 841 (1948); certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 885 (1948). [11] Arkansas required a permit for the transportation of liquor across its territory, but granted the same upon application and payment of a nominal fee. Virginia required carriers engaged in similar through-shipments to use the most direct route, carry a bill of lading describing that route, and post a $1000 bond conditioned on lawful transportation; and also stipulated that the true consignee be named in the bill of lading and be one having the legal right to receive the shipment at destination. [12] Collins _v._ Yosemite Park, 304 U.S. 518, 537-538 (1938). [13] United States _v._ Frankfort Distilleries, Inc., 324 U.S. 293, 297-299 (1945). [14] Ibid. 301-302. [15] Jatros _v._ Bowles, 143 F. (2d) 453, 455 (1944); Barnett _v._ Bowles, 151 F. (2d) 77, 79 (1945), certiorari denied, 326 U.S. 766 (1945); Dowling Bros. Distilling Co. _v._ United States, 153 F. (2d) 353, 357 (1946), certiorari denied, (Gould et al. _v._ United States) 328 U.S. 848 (1946); rehearing denied, 329 U.S. 820 (1946). AMENDMENT 22 PRESIDENTIAL TENURE Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was e
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380  
1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
denied
 
certiorari
 
States
 

United

 
President
 

person

 
office
 
liquors
 

required

 

transportation


Bowles

 
lading
 

Amendment

 

equally

 

Twenty

 
destination
 

Collins

 

Yosemite

 

shipment

 

receive


Distilleries

 

Frankfort

 

Sherman

 

direct

 

greater

 

engaged

 

similar

 

shipments

 
describing
 
consignee

stipulated

 
lawful
 

conditioned

 

AMENDMENT

 

rehearing

 

PRESIDENTIAL

 

TENURE

 

elected

 

Section

 

override


exercise

 
carriers
 

Jatros

 

Barnett

 

Distilling

 
Dowling
 
potency
 

rendered

 

decisions

 
subsequently