FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  
. If we hesitate in believing this of him, it is because we conceive in him a stern intellectual pride and strength, which could not easily kneel to adore. But there we should greatly err. For he recognized in himself-- "Self-knowing, and from thence Magnanimous to correspond with heaven"-- that capacity of song which nothing but sacred Epos could satisfy. Diodati asks him--"_Quid studes?_" and he answers--"_Mehercle, immortalitatem!_" This might persuade us that he finally chose the Fall of Man as he at first had chosen King Arthur. But not so. When Arthur dropped away from his purposes, naturally displaced by the after-choice, the will toward an Epic underwent an answerable revolution. The first subject was called by the "longing after immortality." But another longing, or the longing after another immortality, carried the will and the man to the second. The learning and the learned art of the _Paradise Lost_, concur in inclining us to look upon Milton as an artist rather than a worshipper. On closer consideration of its spirit, we cannot think of his putting his hand to such a work without the inwardly felt conviction that _God was with him in it_. And, what is the feeling with which a youthful mind first regards the _Paradise Lost_? A holy awe--something as if it were a second Bible. So, too, have felt towards it our great poets. Elwood, the Quaker, has told us, but we cannot believe him, that _he_ suggested to Milton the _Paradise Regained_! Hardly credible that, being the natural sequel and complement of the _Paradise Lost_, it should not have occurred to Milton. Pray, did the Quaker _suggest the treatment_? To conceive that man was virtually redeemed when Jesus had avouched, by proof, his perfect obedience, was a view, we think, proper to spring in a religious mind. It is remarkable, however, certainly, that the Atoning Sacrifice, which in the _Paradise Lost_ is brought into the front of the Divine rule and of the poem, in the _Paradise Regained_ hardly appears--if at all. In both you see the holy awe with which Milton shuns describing the scenes of the Passion. Between Adam and Michael, on that "top of speculation" the Visions end at the Deluge. The Crucifixion falls amongst the recorded events, and is told with few and sparing words. You _must_ think that the removal of the dread Crucifixion from the action of the _Paradise Regained_ recommended that action to the poet--contradicting Warburton, who
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Paradise
 

Milton

 

Regained

 

longing

 

conceive

 

immortality

 

action

 

Arthur

 

Quaker

 
Crucifixion

sequel

 

complement

 

occurred

 

contradicting

 

natural

 

Hardly

 

credible

 
recommended
 
virtually
 
treatment

Warburton

 

suggest

 

Deluge

 

recorded

 

Visions

 

speculation

 

events

 

Elwood

 
suggested
 

redeemed


brought
 
sparing
 

describing

 
Atoning
 
Sacrifice
 
scenes
 

Divine

 

appears

 
Passion
 
avouched

perfect
 

removal

 

obedience

 
religious
 
remarkable
 

spring

 

proper

 

Between

 

Michael

 

worshipper