with elaborate commentary.
[684] See Zimmern in Gunkel's _Schoepfung und Chaos_, pp. 415, 416, and
on the other side, Delitzsch, _Babylonische Weltschoepfungsepos_, p. 20.
Zimmern's doubts are justified.
[685] _Proc. Soc. Bibl. Arch._ vi. 7.
[686] _Zeits. f. Assyr._ viii. 121-124. Delitzsch, in his _Babylonische
Weltschoepfungsepos_, pp. 61-68, has elaborately set forth the principles
of the poetic composition. See also D. H. Mueller, _Die Propheten in
ihrer urspruenglichen Form_, pp. 5-14.
[687] _I.e._, did not exist. To be 'called' or to 'bear a name' meant to
be called into existence.
[688] _I.e._, of the waters.
[689] _I.e._, of heaven and earth.
[690] The word used is obscure. Jensen and Zimmern render "reed."
Delitzsch, I think, comes nearer the real meaning with "marsh." See
Haupt's translation, _Proc. Amer. Oriental Soc._, 1896, p. 161.
[691] Delitzsch supplies a parallel phrase like "periods elapsed."
[692] Supplied from Damascius' extract of the work of Berosus on
Babylonia. See Cory, _Ancient Fragments_, p. 92; Delitzsch,
_Babylonische Weltschoepfungsepos_, p. 94.
[693] The _o_ is represented in Babylonian by _a_, and the ending _at_
in Tiamat is an affix which stamps the Babylonian name as feminine.
T'hom in Hebrew is likewise a feminine noun, but it should be noted that
at a certain stage in the development of the Semitic languages, the
feminine is hardly distinguishable from the plural and collective.
[694] Gunkel, _Schoepfung und Chaos_, pp. 29-82, 379-398.
[695] For our purposes it is sufficient to refer for the relations
existing between Damascius and the cuneiform records to Smith's
_Chaldaeische Genesis_, pp. 63-66, to Lenormant's _Essai de Commentaire
sur les fragments Cosmogoniques de Berose_, pp. 67 _seq._, and to
Jensen's _Kosmologie der Babylonier_, pp. 270-272.
[696] The names are given by Damascius as _Apason_ and _Tauthe_.
[697] Suggested by Professor Haupt (Schrader, _Cuneiform Inscriptions
and the Old Testament_, p. 7).
[698] Hommel, _Proc. Soc. Bibl. Arch._, xviii. 19.
[699] See Jensen, _Kosmologie_, pp. 224, 225.
[700] Agumkakrimi Inscription (VR. 33, iv. 50); Nabonnedos (Cylinder,
VR. 64, ll. 16, 17).
[701] Cory's _Ancient Fragments_, p. 58.
[702] See above, pp. 198, 199.
[703] See above, pp. 198, 199.
[704] I avoid the term "Sumerian" here, because I feel convinced that
the play on Anshar is of an entirely artificial character and has no
ph
|