FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435  
436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   >>   >|  
her illustrated. To Alexander are attached stories belonging to both Izdubar and Etana. See Meissner's _Alexander and Gilgamos_, pp. 13-17 (Leipzig, 1894). [850] See, _e.g._, Perrot and Chiplez, _History of Art in Babylonia and Assyria_, i. 84. [851] Article 'Izdubar,' col. 776; see Delitzsch, _Handwoerterbuch_, p. 678. Hommel (_e.g._, _Altisraelitische Ueberlieferung_, p. 39) regards Gilgamesh as a contraction from Gibil (the fire-god) and Gam (or Gab), together with _ish_, an 'Elamitic' ending. If the name is Elamitic, one should hardly expect a Babylonian deity entering as one of the elements. [852] See above, p. 167. [853] See above, p. 284. [854] Haupt's _Das Babylonische Nimrodepos_, p. 93. [855] Lit., 'he who is applied to for giving a decision.' [856] _Ta-par-ra-as_. [857] _Das Babylonische Nimrodepos_ (Leipzig, 1884-91). This edition includes all but the twelfth tablet, which was published by Haupt in the _Beitraege zur Assyriologie_, i. 48-79. For other publications of Haupt on the Gilgamesh epic, see the Bibliography, Sec. 6. The identification with the Biblical Nimrod is now definitely abandoned by scholars, though the picture drawn of Nimrod is influenced by the traditions regarding Gilgamesh. See p. 515. [858] The best general work on the epic (based on Haupt's edition) is A. Jeremias' _Izdubar-Nimrod_ (Leipzig, 1891), a reprint with additions, of his article on 'Izdubar' in Roscher's _Ausfuehrliches Lexicon der Griechischen und Roemischen Mythologie_ ii. [859] _Vorgeschichte der Indo-Europaer_, p. 112. [860] The words for 'city' in the Semitic languages embody this idea. [861] _Old Babylonian Inscription_, i. 2, p. 48. [862] IIR. 50, 55-57; VR. 41, 17, 18. An interesting reference to the wall of Frech occurs Hilprecht, _ib._ i. 1, no. 26. [863] _Kosmologie_, p. 172. [864] Jeremias' _Izdubar-Nimrod_, p. 15, conjectures that the death of the king has evoked distress, but that is highly improbable. That the fragment under consideration belongs to the beginning of the epic is tolerably certain, though not absolutely so. [865] Sixth tablet, l. 192. He brings offerings to Lugal-Marada, _i.e._, the king of Marada--a solar deity. See p. 486. [866] Heuzey, _Sceaux inedits des Rois d'Agade_ (_Revue d'Assyriologie_, iv. 3, p. 9). [867] See above, p. 448. [868] _Anu_ here used in the generic sense of 'lofty,' 'divine.' The phrase is equivalent to the Biblical 'image of God.'
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435  
436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Izdubar

 

Nimrod

 
Leipzig
 

Gilgamesh

 

Marada

 

Elamitic

 

Biblical

 

Jeremias

 

Assyriologie

 

tablet


Babylonische

 
Nimrodepos
 
edition
 

Babylonian

 
Alexander
 

Inscription

 

generic

 

interesting

 

reference

 

embody


Roemischen

 

Mythologie

 

Griechischen

 

Roscher

 
article
 

Ausfuehrliches

 
Lexicon
 

Vorgeschichte

 

Semitic

 

phrase


divine

 
languages
 

Europaer

 

equivalent

 

Hilprecht

 
beginning
 

Sceaux

 
tolerably
 

belongs

 

consideration


fragment

 

inedits

 
absolutely
 

brings

 

offerings

 
Heuzey
 

improbable

 
Kosmologie
 

occurs

 

evoked