FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229  
230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>   >|  
d to be no disposition on his part to acquiesce in my plans. This attitude on the part of the French was evidently well known in London, for, on December 13th, I received a letter from Winston Churchill in which he said: "Of course, we are disappointed here with the turn events have taken, but we shall do our best to help the French." This meant that Joffre had rejected my scheme, but had substituted the idea of another kind of attack, to be made chiefly by the French, with fewer troops, in a different direction and with quite another objective. I will return to this presently, for such an operation actually took place and proved to be a very feeble substitute for what I had intended. Yielding thus to French representations, our Government began to weaken. Churchill adhered to his views throughout, but was not supported. The terms of Sir Edward Grey's communication of December 9th were unanswerable. Everything which subsequently happened in the course of the war has proved it. The possession by the Germans of that strip of Belgian coast-line has been the sharpest of all thorns with which they have succeeded in pricking us. It has been one of the main causes of the prolongation of the war. Their vigorous and successful defence against all our attacks in the autumn of 1917 showed the value which they attached to the retention of this coast-line. Lord Kitchener addressed a Memorandum to me in January, 1915, from which I quote _in extenso_: "The questions raised in your recent Memorandum of January 3rd, 1915"--he wrote--"and in your appreciation of the situation in the various theatres of war, were considered by a War Council presided over by the Prime Minister, on Thursday, January 7th, and Friday, January 8th. "The principal questions discussed were-- 1. The proposed advance to Zeebrugge. 2. The organisation of the New Armies. 3. The possibility of employing British Forces in a different theatre to that in which they are now used. "With regard to the proposed advance to Zeebrugge, the First Lord's telegram, No. 2623, sent to you on January 2nd, explained the difficulties imposed on the Admiralty by the development of Zeebrugge as a base for submarines, and the War Council realised that one of your principal motives in suggesting an offensive to effect the capture of Ostend and Zeebrugge was to ease the naval position. "On a general review, however, of the whole situation, naval and mi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229  
230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

January

 

Zeebrugge

 

French

 

Council

 
Memorandum
 

situation

 

questions

 

advance

 
principal
 

proposed


proved
 
December
 

Churchill

 

Thursday

 

presided

 

Minister

 

theatres

 

considered

 

addressed

 

showed


attached
 

autumn

 

defence

 

attacks

 

retention

 

Kitchener

 
recent
 
raised
 

extenso

 
appreciation

Forces

 

submarines

 
realised
 

motives

 

suggesting

 
development
 
explained
 

difficulties

 

imposed

 

Admiralty


offensive

 

effect

 

review

 
general
 

capture

 
Ostend
 

position

 

Armies

 

possibility

 
employing