FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634  
635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   >>   >|  
e.] United States _v._ Schurz, 102 U.S. 378 (1880); United States ex rel. Dunlap _v._ Black, 128 U.S. 40 (1888). _Cf._ Decatur _v._ Paulding, 14 Pet. 497 (1840); and Riverside Oil Co. _v._ Hitchcock, 190 U.S. 316 (1903), where the rule is reiterated that neither injunction nor mandamus will lie against an officer to control him in the exercise of an official duty which requires the exercise of his judgment and discretion. [473] This was originally on the theory that the Supreme Court of the District had inherited, via the common law of Maryland, the jurisdiction of the King's Bench "over inferior jurisdictions and officers." 12 Pet. at 614 and 620-621. [474] Little _v._ Barreme, 2 Cr. 170 (1804); United States _v._ Lee, above; [Transcriber's Note: Reference is to Footnote 470, above.] Spaulding _v._ Vilas, 161 U.S. 483 (1896). [475] Bell _v._ Hood, 327 U.S. 678 (1946). The decision is based on an interpretation of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 41 (1). [476] Mitchell _v._ Clark, 110 U.S. 633 (1884). An official action is indemnifiable if Congress could have authorized it in the first place, or if it was done under "imperative orders which could not be resisted," or "under necessity or mistake." Ibid. 640-641. [477] Tennessee _v._ Davis, 100 U.S. 257 (1880); In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890). _Cf._ Maryland _v._ Soper, 270 U.S. 9 (1926). [478] 17 Op. Atty. Gen. 419 (1882). _See also_ Hinds' Precedents, III, Sec. 2315-2318 (1907). [479] The Belknap Case, ibid. Sec. 2445. [480] Elliot, Debates, V, 341, 528. [481] Ibid. IV, 375. [482] The Federalist No. 65. For the above _see_ William S. Carpenter, Judicial Tenure in the United States (Yale University Press, 1918), 105-106. [483] John Quincy Adams, Memoirs, I, 321, 322 (1874). [484] Trial of Andrew Johnson, I, (Government Printing Office, 1868), 147. [485] Ibid. 409. Johnson and his Cabinet were much concerned over rumors that it was the intention of his enemies in the House, following impeachment and pending the trial, to put him under arrest and/or suspend him from office. Gideon Welles, Diary, III, 21, 27, 50, 57, 60, 62, 151, 200, 235, 237, 238, 291, 313. But no such step was attempted. Several state constitutions contain provisions authorizing suspension from office in such a case. [486] Carpenter, Judicial Tenure, 145-153. [487] Senate proceedings in Cong. Record, vol. 80, pp. 5558-5559, (April 16, 1936). [488] On this account, as well as because o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634  
635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 
United
 

Tenure

 

Judicial

 
exercise
 

official

 
Maryland
 

Johnson

 

office

 

Carpenter


Memoirs

 

Quincy

 

Precedents

 

Office

 

Printing

 

Andrew

 

Government

 
Federalist
 

Elliot

 

University


William
 

Cabinet

 
Belknap
 
Debates
 

proceedings

 

Senate

 

suspension

 

Several

 
constitutions
 

authorizing


provisions

 
Record
 

account

 

attempted

 

pending

 

arrest

 

suspend

 

Welles

 

Gideon

 

impeachment


concerned

 

rumors

 

intention

 

enemies

 

common

 
inherited
 

jurisdiction

 
District
 

originally

 

theory