act was passed May 27, 1921 (42 Stat. 8) which requires
presidential license for the landing and operation of cables connecting
the United States with foreign countries. Quincy Wright, The Control of
American Foreign Relations (New York, 1922) 302 fn. 75.
[432] Santiago _v._ Nogueras, 214 U.S. 260 (1909).
[433] Madsen _v._ Kinsella, 343 U.S. 341 (1952).
[434] Charlton _v._ Kelly, 229 U.S. 447 (1913). _See also_ Botiller _v._
Dominguez, 130 U.S. 238 (1889).
[435] Sinclair _v._ United States, 279 U.S. 263, 289, 297 (1929).
[436] 12 Stat. 755.
[437] Berdahl, War Powers of the Executive in the United States
(University of Illinois, 1921), 69.
[438] 343 U.S. 579, 695.
[439] 89 Cong. Rec. 3992 (1943).
[440] 57 Stat. 163.
[441] 343 U.S. 579, 697.
[442] 341 U.S. 114 (1951).
[443] _See_ Hooe _v._ United States, 218 U.S. 322, 335-336 (1910);
United States _v._ North American Co., 253 U.S. 330, 333 (1920). _Cf._
Larson _v._ Domestic and Foreign Corp., 337 U.S. 682, 701-702 (1949).
[444] 341 U.S. 114, 119.
[445] _See_ p. 486.
[446] Brief for the United States, No. 278, October Term, 1914, pp. 11,
75-77, quoted by the Chief Justice in 343 U.S. 579, 689-691. Assistant
Attorney General Knaebel's name was also on the Brief.
[447] 343 U.S. 579, 597.
[448] Ibid. 602.
[449] 343 U.S. 579, 631-632.
[450] 13 How. 115 (1852).
[451] 13 Wall. 623 (1872).
[452] 260 U.S. 327 (1922).
[453] 341 U.S. 114 (1949).
[454] 315 U.S. 203, 230 (1942).
[455] Federalist No. 64.
[456] _See also_ 40 Op. Atty. Gen. 250, 253 (1942).
[457] 343 U.S. 579, 639, 640.
[458] Ibid. 653, 654.
[459] 343 U.S. 579, 657.
[460] Ibid. 659.
[461] 2 Cr. 170 (1804).
[462] 343 U.S. 579, 662, 663.
[463] Ibid. 662.
[464] 343 U.S. 579, 678, 679.
[465] Ibid. 705.
[466] Ibid. 708-709.
[467] 4 Wall. 475 (1867).
[468] Ibid. 484.
[469] Ibid. 500-501.
[470] Kendall _v._ United States, 12 Pet. 524 (1838); United States _v._
Lee, 106 U.S. 196 (1882). It should be noted, however, that if the
President fails to act, or if he adopts a narrow construction of a
statute which he dislikes, and on this ground professes inability to
act, the only remedy available against him is impeachment.
[471] Noble _v._ Union River Logging R. Co., 147 U.S. 165 (1893);
Philadelphia Co. _v._ Stimson, 223 U.S. 605 (1912).
[472] Kendall _v._ United States, above; [Transcriber's Note: Reference
is to Footnote 470, abov
|