FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656  
657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   >>   >|  
aintained by the Court, as the right and dignity of the Court itself."[90] The Test-Oath Act of July 2, 1862, which purported to exclude former Confederates from the practice of law in the federal courts, was invalidated in Ex parte Garland.[91] In the course of his opinion for the Court, Justice Field discussed generally the power to admit and disbar attorneys. The exercise of such a power, he declared, is judicial power. The attorney is an officer of the Court and though Congress may prescribe qualifications for the practice of law in the federal courts, it may not do so in such a way as to inflict punishment contrary to the Constitution or to deprive a pardon of the President of its legal effect.[92] Organization of Courts, Tenure and Compensation of Judges "ONE SUPREME COURT" The Constitution is almost completely silent concerning the organization of the federal judiciary. Although it provides for one Supreme Court, it makes no reference to the size and composition of the Court, the time or place for sitting, or its internal organization save for the reference to the Chief Justice in the impeachment provision of article I, Sec. 3, relating to impeachment of the President. All these matters are therefore confided to Congressional determination. Under the terms of the Judiciary Act of 1789, the Court consisted of a Chief Justice and five Associate Justices. This number was gradually increased until it reached a total of ten judges under the act of March 3, 1863. Due to the exigencies of Reconstruction and the tension existing between Congress and the President the number was reduced to seven as vacancies should occur, by the act of April 16, 1866. The number never actually fell below eight, and on April 10, 1869, with Andrew Johnson out of the White House, Congress restored the number to nine, where it has since remained. There have been proposals at various times for an organization of the Court into sections or divisions. No authoritative judicial expression is available, although Chief Justice Hughes in a letter to Senator Wheeler of March 21, 1937, expressed doubts concerning the validity of such a device and stated that "the Constitution does not appear to authorize two or more Supreme Courts functioning in effect as separate courts."[93] Congress has also determined the time and place of sessions of the Court, going so far in 1801 as to change its terms so that for fourteen months, between December, 180
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656  
657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Congress
 

Justice

 

number

 

organization

 

courts

 

Constitution

 
federal
 

President

 

reference

 

judicial


Supreme
 

effect

 

Courts

 
impeachment
 
practice
 
exigencies
 

Reconstruction

 
tension
 

Andrew

 

Johnson


judges

 

vacancies

 

reached

 

increased

 

existing

 
reduced
 

restored

 
authorize
 

functioning

 

separate


doubts

 

validity

 

device

 

stated

 
fourteen
 

months

 
December
 

change

 

determined

 

sessions


expressed

 

proposals

 

gradually

 
remained
 

sections

 
divisions
 
letter
 

Senator

 
Wheeler
 
Hughes