FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  
horization was not only sustained in Osborn _v._ Bank of United States,[300] but an act of incorporation was declared to be a law of the United States for purposes of jurisdiction in cases involving federal questions. Consequently, the door was opened to other federally chartered corporations to go into the federal courts after the act of 1875 vested original jurisdiction generally in the lower courts of such questions. Corporations, chartered by Congress, particularly railroads, quickly availed themselves of this opportunity, and succeeded in the Pacific Railroad Removal Cases[301] in removing suits from the State to the federal courts in cases involving no federal question solely on the basis of federal incorporation. The result of this and similar cases was Congressional legislation depriving national banks of the right to sue in the federal courts solely on the basis of federal incorporation in 1882,[302] depriving railroads holding federal charters of this right in 1915,[303] and finally in 1925 removing from federal jurisdiction involving federal questions all suits brought by federally chartered corporations, solely on the basis of federal incorporation, except where the United States holds half of the stock.[304] REMOVAL FROM STATE COURTS OF SUITS AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICIALS Of greater significance and of immediate importance to the maintenance of national supremacy are those cases involving State prosecution of federal officials for acts committed under the color of federal authority. As early as 1815 Congress provided temporarily for the removal of prosecutions against customs officials for acts done or omitted as an officer or under color of an act of Congress, except for offenses involving corporal punishment.[305] In 1833, in partial answer to South Carolina's Nullification Proclamation, Congress enacted the so-called Force Act providing for removal from State courts of all prosecutions against any officer of the United States or under color thereof.[306] As a part of the Civil War legislation and limited to the war period, an act in 1863 provided for removal from State courts of cases brought against federal officials for acts committed during the war and justified under the authority of Congress and the President.[307] The act of 1833, with amendments, has been kept in force. Since 1948 the United States Code has provided for the removal to a federal district court of civil actions or criminal prosecuti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
federal
 

courts

 

States

 

United

 

involving

 

Congress

 
incorporation
 

removal

 

questions

 

chartered


officials
 

solely

 

jurisdiction

 
provided
 
officer
 
prosecutions
 

removing

 
depriving
 

authority

 

committed


brought

 

national

 

legislation

 

federally

 

corporations

 
railroads
 

partial

 
punishment
 

answer

 

enacted


Proclamation

 

Nullification

 

Carolina

 

corporal

 
sustained
 

temporarily

 
declared
 

omitted

 

called

 

Osborn


customs

 

offenses

 

horization

 
amendments
 

criminal

 
prosecuti
 
actions
 

district

 
President
 
thereof