FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659  
660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   >>   >|  
o $10,000 if above that figure. While this provision presented no questions of its own constitutionality, it did raise the question of what judges' salaries could be constitutionally reduced. In O'Donoghue _v._ United States[106] the section was held inapplicable to the salaries of judges of the courts of the District of Columbia on the ground that as to their organization and tenure and compensation, Congress was limited by the provisions of article III. In Williams _v._ United States,[107] on the other hand, it was ruled that the reduction was applicable to the salaries of the judges of the Court of Claims, that being a legislative court created in pursuance of the power of Congress to pay the debts of the United States and to consent to suits against the United States. As such it is not within the provisions of article III respecting the tenure and compensation of judges. COURTS OF SPECIALIZED JURISDICTION By virtue of its power "to ordain and establish" courts Congress has occasionally created courts under article III to exercise a specialized jurisdiction. Otherwise these tribunals are like other article III courts in that they exercise "the judicial power of the United States," and only that power, that their judges must be appointed by the President and the Senate and must hold office during good behavior subject to removal by impeachment only, and that the compensation of their judges cannot be diminished during their continuance in office. One example of such courts was the Commerce Court created by the Mann-Elkins Act of 1910,[108] which was given exclusive jurisdiction of all cases to enforce orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission except those involving money penalties and criminal punishment; of cases brought to enjoin, annul, or set aside orders of the Commission; of cases brought under the act of 1903 to prevent unjust discriminations; and of all mandamus proceedings authorized by the act of 1903. This court actually functioned for less than three years, being abolished in 1913, as was mentioned above. The Emergency Court of Appeals of 1942 Another court of specialized jurisdiction but created for a limited time only was the Emergency Court of Appeals organized by the Emergency Price Control Act of January 30, 1942.[109] By the terms of the statute this court consisted of three or more judges designated by the Chief Justice from the judges of the United States district courts and circuit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659  
660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
judges
 

States

 

United

 

courts

 

created

 

article

 
jurisdiction
 

Congress

 

compensation

 

salaries


Emergency
 

limited

 

Appeals

 
provisions
 
brought
 
orders
 

exercise

 
specialized
 

office

 

Commission


Commerce

 

tenure

 

provision

 

enjoin

 

prevent

 
proceedings
 

mandamus

 
discriminations
 

punishment

 

unjust


figure

 

criminal

 

enforce

 

questions

 
exclusive
 

Interstate

 
presented
 

penalties

 

authorized

 

involving


statute

 

January

 

Control

 
consisted
 

district

 
circuit
 
Justice
 

designated

 
organized
 
abolished