application of the possessive sign to
--by what _governed_
--whether the rule for, has true exceptions
--appos. of one with an other, ("_For_ DAVID _my_ SERVANT'S _sake_,")
the construc. examined
--appar. in abstract construc., ("_All_ MINE _are_ THINE,")
--as governed by a part, the construc. examined; COROL.
--why the governm. of, should be limited to nouns only
--whether before a real part., denotes the possession of something
--_Possessive sign_, omission oL not a true ellips.
--always implies a governing word,
--how taken by compounds
--liable to be added to adjunct of the former noun
--whether it can be rightly added to separate adjectives, ("_The_
GUILTY'S _prayer_,")
--_which_ noun of connected possessives takes
--Poss. case, place and order of
--generally equivalent to prep. _of_ and _the objective_,
--governed by something not expressed, ("St. Paul's,")
--_Possessives, connected_, how to be taken,
--Poss. _singular_, with _s_ omitted, ("For CONSCIENCE' _sake_")
--_Poss. case_ of nouns sing, in _ss_, false teaching of KIRKH. _et
al._, respecting the formation of
--MURR. rule for the construc. of, why objectionable,
--compounds embracing, lack uniformity in writing,
--peculiarity of, with respect to correlatives, ("Father's son,")
--_Possessive_ relation between a portion of time and its correlative
action, ("THREE YEARS' _hard work_" or, "_Three years_ OF HARD
WORK,")
--_Poss. case_, appropriate form of, to be observed,
--plural, with a noun in forced agreem., ("For OUR PARTS,") ib., N. iv:
--needless use of, before a participle, ("In THEIR _pronouncing the
Greek_,")
--_Possessive pronouns, my, thy, his_, &c., how often should be
inserted, or repeated

_Potential mood_, defined
--_Potential mood_, why so called; by what _signs_ distinguished,
--may, like the indic., be used in asking questions; why by some
included in the subj.
--in what tenses used; nature of the imperf. tense
--formation and inflection of its tenses, shown in the verb LOVE,
conjugated,

_Power_ of a letter, the _powers_ of the letters, what meant by, when
spoken of,
--The _power_ of a letter is not its sound, as MURR. et al incorrectly
teach
--The _simple powers_ of the letters, many irreconcileable doctrines
have been advanced thereon