FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  
rror, sanctaque ignorantia, quid sit id, quod tant[`u]m perituri vident."[32] _Extract from Ptolemy._--This connects the Angles with the _Suevi_, and _Langobardi_, and places them on the Middle Elbe.--[Greek: Entos kai mesogeion ethnon megista men esti to te ton Souebon ton Angeilon, hoi eisin anatolikoteroi ton Langobardon, anateinontes pros tas arktous mechri ton meson tou Albios potamou]. _Extract from Procopius._--For this see s. 55. _Heading of a law referred to the age of Charlemagne._--This connects them with the Werini (Varni) and the Thuringians--"Incipit lex _Angliorum_ et _Werinorum_ hoc est _Thuringorum_." s. 48. These notices agree in giving the Angles a _German_ locality, and in connecting them ethnologically, and philologically with the _Germans_ of Germany. And such was, undoubtedly, the case. Nevertheless, it may be seen from s. 15 that a _Danish_ origin has been assigned to them. The exact Germanic affinities of the Angles are, how ever, difficult to ascertain, since the tribes with which they are classed are differently classed. This we shall see by asking the following questions:-- s. 49. What were the _Langobardi_, with whom the Angles were connected by Tacitus? The most important fact to be known concerning them is, that the general opinion is in favour of their having belonged to either the _High_-German, or Moeso-Gothic division, rather than to the _Low_. s. 50. What were the _Suevi_, with whom the Angles were connected by Tacitus? The most important fact to be known concerning them is, that the general opinion is in favour of their having belonged to either the _High_-German or Moeso-Gothic division rather than to the _Low_. s. 51. What were the _Werini_, with whom the Angles were connected in the _Leges Anglorum et Werinorum_? Without having any particular _data_ for connecting the Werini (Varni, [Greek: Ouarnoi]) with either the High-German, or the Moeso-Gothic divisions, there are certain facts in favour of their being _Slavonic_. s. 52. What were the _Thuringians_, with whom the Angles are connected in the _Leges Anglorum_? Germanic in locality, and most probably allied to the Goths of Moesia in language. If not, High-Germans. s. 53. Of the Reudigni, Eudoses, Nuithones, Suardones, and Aviones, too little is known in detail to make the details an inquiry of importance. s. 54. The reader has now got a general view of the extent to which the position of the Angles, as a Ge
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Angles

 

German

 
connected
 

general

 

Gothic

 
favour
 

Werini

 

Anglorum

 

Thuringians

 
division

Germans

 
Tacitus
 

Germanic

 

classed

 

important

 
locality
 

belonged

 

connecting

 

opinion

 

Werinorum


connects
 

Extract

 
Langobardi
 

importance

 

inquiry

 

reader

 

details

 
Without
 

questions

 

differently


position
 
extent
 

detail

 
Slavonic
 

allied

 

Ouarnoi

 

divisions

 

Moesia

 
Suardones
 
Nuithones

tribes

 

Aviones

 

Eudoses

 

Reudigni

 
language
 

Souebon

 

Angeilon

 

ethnon

 
megista
 

anatolikoteroi