FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878  
879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   >>   >|  
en law is said to be given for the correction of the natural law, either because it supplies what was wanting to the natural law; or because the natural law was perverted in the hearts of some men, as to certain matters, so that they esteemed those things good which are naturally evil; which perversion stood in need of correction. Reply Obj. 2: All men alike, both guilty and innocent, die the death of nature: which death of nature is inflicted by the power of God on account of original sin, according to 1 Kings 2:6: "The Lord killeth and maketh alive." Consequently, by the command of God, death can be inflicted on any man, guilty or innocent, without any injustice whatever. In like manner adultery is intercourse with another's wife; who is allotted to him by the law emanating from God. Consequently intercourse with any woman, by the command of God, is neither adultery nor fornication. The same applies to theft, which is the taking of another's property. For whatever is taken by the command of God, to Whom all things belong, is not taken against the will of its owner, whereas it is in this that theft consists. Nor is it only in human things, that whatever is commanded by God is right; but also in natural things, whatever is done by God, is, in some way, natural, as stated in the First Part, Q. 105, A. 6, ad 1. Reply Obj. 3: A thing is said to belong to the natural law in two ways. First, because nature inclines thereto: e.g. that one should not do harm to another. Secondly, because nature did not bring in the contrary: thus we might say that for man to be naked is of the natural law, because nature did not give him clothes, but art invented them. In this sense, "the possession of all things in common and universal freedom" are said to be of the natural law, because, to wit, the distinction of possessions and slavery were not brought in by nature, but devised by human reason for the benefit of human life. Accordingly the law of nature was not changed in this respect, except by addition. ________________________ SIXTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 94, Art. 6] Whether the Law of Nature Can Be Abolished from the Heart of Man? Objection 1: It would seem that the natural law can be abolished from the heart of man. Because on Rom. 2:14, "When the Gentiles who have not the law," etc. a gloss says that "the law of righteousness, which sin had blotted out, is graven on the heart of man when he is restored by grace." But the law of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878  
879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

natural

 

nature

 
things
 

command

 

inflicted

 

innocent

 

adultery

 
intercourse
 

guilty

 

correction


Consequently

 

belong

 

possessions

 

slavery

 
devised
 

Accordingly

 

benefit

 

reason

 

brought

 

distinction


possession

 

contrary

 
Secondly
 
changed
 
common
 

universal

 
freedom
 

clothes

 
invented
 
Whether

Gentiles
 

Because

 
righteousness
 
restored
 

graven

 

blotted

 
abolished
 
ARTICLE
 

addition

 
Nature

Objection

 

Abolished

 

respect

 

killeth

 

maketh

 

original

 
hearts
 

perverted

 
wanting
 

allotted