FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889  
890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   >>   >|  
e legal just, i.e. positive law, into three parts. For some things are laid down simply in a general way: and these are the general laws. Of these he says that "the legal is that which originally was a matter of indifference, but which, when enacted, is so no longer": as the fixing of the ransom of a captive. Some things affect the community in one respect, and individuals in another. These are called "privileges," i.e. "private laws," as it were, because they regard private persons, although their power extends to many matters; and in regard to these, he adds, "and further, all particular acts of legislation." Other matters are legal, not through being laws, but through being applications of general laws to particular cases: such are decrees which have the force of law; and in regard to these, he adds "all matters subject to decrees." Reply Obj. 2: A principle of direction should be applicable to many; wherefore (Metaph. x, text. 4) the Philosopher says that all things belonging to one genus, are measured by one, which is the principle in that genus. For if there were as many rules or measures as there are things measured or ruled, they would cease to be of use, since their use consists in being applicable to many things. Hence law would be of no use, if it did not extend further than to one single act. Because the decrees of prudent men are made for the purpose of directing individual actions; whereas law is a general precept, as stated above (Q. 92, A. 2, Obj. 2). Reply Obj. 3: "We must not seek the same degree of certainty in all things" (Ethic. i, 3). Consequently in contingent matters, such as natural and human things, it is enough for a thing to be certain, as being true in the greater number of instances, though at times and less frequently it fail. ________________________ SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 96, Art. 2] Whether It Belongs to the Human Law to Repress All Vices? Objection 1: It would seem that it belongs to human law to repress all vices. For Isidore says (Etym. v, 20) that "laws were made in order that, in fear thereof, man's audacity might be held in check." But it would not be held in check sufficiently, unless all evils were repressed by law. Therefore human laws should repress all evils. Obj. 2: Further, the intention of the lawgiver is to make the citizens virtuous. But a man cannot be virtuous unless he forbear from all kinds of vice. Therefore it belongs to human law to repress all vi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889  
890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

things

 

general

 
matters
 

decrees

 

regard

 

repress

 

principle

 
belongs
 

virtuous

 

Therefore


measured

 

applicable

 

private

 

SECOND

 
ARTICLE
 

Whether

 

Belongs

 

Repress

 

Objection

 

originally


natural

 

contingent

 
Consequently
 
instances
 
greater
 

number

 
frequently
 

Further

 
intention
 
lawgiver

positive
 

repressed

 
citizens
 
forbear
 

sufficiently

 

Isidore

 
certainty
 
simply
 

audacity

 
thereof

captive

 

wherefore

 

affect

 

direction

 

respect

 

community

 
Metaph
 

ransom

 
fixing
 

longer