FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904  
905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   >>   >|  
mon good in view; imprudent, if he ignores the reasons for granting dispensations. Hence Our Lord says (Luke 12:42): "Who, thinkest thou, is the faithful and wise dispenser [Douay: steward], whom his lord setteth over his family?" Reply Obj. 1: When a person is dispensed from observing the general law, this should not be done to the prejudice of, but with the intention of benefiting, the common good. Reply Obj. 2: It is not respect of persons if unequal measures are served out to those who are themselves unequal. Wherefore when the condition of any person requires that he should reasonably receive special treatment, it is not respect of persons if he be the object of special favor. Reply Obj. 3: Natural law, so far as it contains general precepts, which never fail, does not allow of dispensations. In other precepts, however, which are as conclusions of the general precepts, man sometimes grants a dispensation: for instance, that a loan should not be paid back to the betrayer of his country, or something similar. But to the Divine law each man stands as a private person to the public law to which he is subject. Wherefore just as none can dispense from public human law, except the man from whom the law derives its authority, or his delegate; so, in the precepts of the Divine law, which are from God, none can dispense but God, or the man to whom He may give special power for that purpose. ________________________ QUESTION 98 OF THE OLD LAW (In Six Articles) In due sequence we must now consider the Old Law; and (1) The Law itself; (2) Its precepts. Under the first head there are six points of inquiry: (1) Whether the Old Law was good? (2) Whether it was from God? (3) Whether it came from Him through the angels? (4) Whether it was given to all? (5) Whether it was binding on all? (6) Whether it was given at a suitable time? ________________________ FIRST ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 98, Art. 1] Whether the Old Law Was Good? Objection 1: It would seem that the Old Law was not good. For it is written (Ezech. 20:25): "I gave them statutes that were not good, and judgments in which they shall not live." But a law is not said to be good except on account of the goodness of the precepts that it contains. Therefore the Old Law was not good. Obj. 2: Further, it belongs to the goodness of a law that it conduce to the common welfare, as Isidore says (Etym. v, 3). But the Old Law was not salutary; rather w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904  
905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Whether

 

precepts

 
general
 

special

 

person

 

Wherefore

 

goodness

 
persons
 

respect

 

unequal


Divine

 

common

 

public

 

dispense

 
dispensations
 

statutes

 

sequence

 

purpose

 

QUESTION

 

account


judgments

 

points

 
Articles
 
Therefore
 
suitable
 

binding

 
welfare
 

ARTICLE

 
Isidore
 
Objection

Further
 

salutary

 
conduce
 
belongs
 

written

 

angels

 
inquiry
 
dispensed
 

observing

 
family

setteth

 

prejudice

 

served

 

intention

 

benefiting

 

measures

 
steward
 

granting

 
reasons
 

ignores