FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888  
889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   >>   >|  
? (3) Whether human law is competent to direct all acts of virtue? (4) Whether it binds man in conscience? (5) Whether all men are subject to human law? (6) Whether those who are under the law may act beside the letter of the law? ________________________ FIRST ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 96, Art. 1] Whether Human Law Should Be Framed for the Community Rather Than for the Individual? Objection 1: It would seem that human law should be framed not for the community, but rather for the individual. For the Philosopher says (Ethic. v, 7) that "the legal just . . . includes all particular acts of legislation . . . and all those matters which are the subject of decrees," which are also individual matters, since decrees are framed about individual actions. Therefore law is framed not only for the community, but also for the individual. Obj. 2: Further, law is the director of human acts, as stated above (Q. 90, AA. 1, 2). But human acts are about individual matters. Therefore human laws should be framed, not for the community, but rather for the individual. Obj. 3: Further, law is a rule and measure of human acts, as stated above (Q. 90, AA. 1, 2). But a measure should be most certain, as stated in _Metaph._ x. Since therefore in human acts no general proposition can be so certain as not to fail in some individual cases, it seems that laws should be framed not in general but for individual cases. _On the contrary,_ The Jurist says (Pandect. Justin. lib. i, tit. iii, art. ii; De legibus, etc.) that "laws should be made to suit the majority of instances; and they are not framed according to what may possibly happen in an individual case." _I answer that,_ Whatever is for an end should be proportionate to that end. Now the end of law is the common good; because, as Isidore says (Etym. v, 21) that "law should be framed, not for any private benefit, but for the common good of all the citizens." Hence human laws should be proportionate to the common good. Now the common good comprises many things. Wherefore law should take account of many things, as to persons, as to matters, and as to times. Because the community of the state is composed of many persons; and its good is procured by many actions; nor is it established to endure for only a short time, but to last for all time by the citizens succeeding one another, as Augustine says (De Civ. Dei ii, 21; xxii, 6). Reply Obj. 1: The Philosopher (Ethic. v, 7) divides th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888  
889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

individual

 

framed

 
Whether
 

matters

 

community

 

common

 

stated

 
decrees
 

actions

 

Therefore


measure

 

proportionate

 

citizens

 

things

 
persons
 

general

 

Further

 

subject

 

Philosopher

 

Isidore


conscience

 

benefit

 
private
 
happen
 
possibly
 

instances

 
majority
 

Whatever

 
comprises
 
answer

virtue
 

succeeding

 
endure
 
Augustine
 

divides

 

established

 
account
 
direct
 

Wherefore

 
Because

procured

 

competent

 

composed

 

director

 

Should

 

Community

 
Framed
 

ARTICLE

 
Rather
 

includes