trines _ariya_ in the sense of Aryan not
of noble. But even the Blessed One may not have been infallible in
ethnography. When we call a thing British we do not mean to refer it to
the ancient Britons more than to the Saxons or Normans. And was the
Buddha an Aryan? See V. Smith, _Oxford History of India_, p. 47 for
doubts.]
[Footnote 6: This is not altogether true of the modern temple ritual.]
[Footnote 7: It is very unfortunate that English usage should make this
word appear the same as Brahman, the name of a caste, and there is much
to be said for using the old-fashioned word Brahmin to denote the caste,
for it is clear, though not correct. In Sanskrit there are several
similar words which are liable to be confused in English. In the
nominative case they are:
(1) Brahmanah, a man of the highest caste.
(2) Brahmanam, an ancient liturgical treatise.
(3) Brahma, the Godhead, stem Brahman, neuter.
(4) Brahma, a masculine nominative also formed from the stem Brahman and
used as the name of a personal deity.
For (3) the stem Brahman is commonly used, as being distinct from
Brahma, though liable to be confounded with the name of the caste.]
[Footnote 8: For some years most scholars accepted the opinion that the
Buddha died in 487 B.C. but the most recent researches into the history
of the Saisunaga dynasty suggest that the date should be put back to 554
B.C. See Vincent Smith, _Oxford History of India_, p. 52.]
[Footnote 9: This is sometimes rendered simply by desire but _desire_ in
English is a vague word and may include feelings which do not come
within the Pali _tanha_. The Buddha did not reprobate good desires. See
Mrs Rhys David's _Buddhism_, p. 222 and _E.R.E._ s.v. Desire.]
[Footnote 10: It is practically correct to say that Buddhism was the
first universal and missionary religion, but Mahavira, the founder of
the Jains and probably somewhat slightly his senior, is credited with
the same wide view.]
[Footnote 11: It may be conveniently and correctly called Pali Buddhism.
This is better than Southern Buddhism or Hinayana, for the Buddhism of
Java which lies even farther to the south is not the same and there were
formerly Hinayanists in Central Asia and China.]
[Footnote 12: See Finot, _J.A._ 1912, n. 121-136.]
[Footnote 13: There is no Indian record of Bodhidharma's doctrine and
its origin is obscure, but it seems to have been a compound of Buddhism
and Vedantism.]
[Footnote 14: T
|