FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112  
113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>   >|  
e majority of the ships therein engaged were slow. But trawlers are unsatisfactory escort vessels. In the early stages of the convoy system difficulties were experienced from the fact that all the available destroyers and most of the sloops were used as escorts, with the result that the ships not under convoy were left with but little protection. CHAPTER V THE CONVOY SYSTEM AT WORK As has been mentioned in Chapter II., the first ships to be brought under a system of convoy were those engaged in the French coal trade and in the trade between Scandinavia and the United Kingdom. In the case of the _French coal trade_, commencing in March, 1917, the steamships engaged in the trade were sailed in groups from four different assembly ports, viz.: Southend to Boulogne and Calais. St. Helens to Havre. Portland to Cherbourg. Penzance to Brest. Between Southend and Boulogne and Calais the protection was given by the vessels of the Dover Patrol in the course of their ordinary duties, but for the other three routes special escort forces were utilized, and daily convoys were the rule. Owing to the great demand for coal in France, sailing vessels were also used, and sailed under convoy from several of the south-west ports. A large organization was required to deal with the trade, and this was built up under the supervision of Captain Reginald G.H. Henderson, C.B., of the Anti-Submarine Division of the Naval Staff, working under Vice-Admiral (then Rear-Admiral) Sir Alexander Duff, head of the Division, in conference with the Commanders-in-Chief, Portsmouth and Plymouth, under whose direction and protection the convoys were run. The immunity of this trade, carried out in the infested waters of the English Channel, from successful attack by submarines was extraordinary. No doubt the small size of the vessels concerned and their comparatively shallow draught were a contributory cause to this immunity. The figures for the period March to August, 1917, show that 8,825 vessels crossed the Channel under convoy, and that only fourteen were lost. The history of the _Scandinavian and East Coast convoys_ dates back to the autumn of 1916, when heavy losses were being incurred amongst Scandinavian ships due to submarine attack. Thus in October, 1916, the losses amongst Norwegian and Swedish ships by submarine attack were more than three times as great as the previous highest monthly losses. Some fear existed that the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112  
113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

vessels

 

convoy

 

losses

 
attack
 

convoys

 

protection

 

engaged

 
Scandinavian
 

Admiral

 

sailed


French

 

Division

 
escort
 

immunity

 

Calais

 
submarine
 

Channel

 

Southend

 

Boulogne

 

system


Plymouth
 

Portsmouth

 
highest
 

carried

 

direction

 

infested

 

monthly

 

waters

 
Alexander
 

Submarine


Henderson
 

Reginald

 

existed

 

working

 
conference
 

Commanders

 

English

 

history

 
fourteen
 

crossed


autumn

 

incurred

 

October

 

Norwegian

 
Swedish
 

concerned

 

comparatively

 

previous

 
submarines
 

extraordinary