FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271  
1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   >>   >|  
zed here did not lose her citizenship and was therefore not subject to deportation because of her removal to Sweden during her minority, it appearing that her parents resumed their citizenship in that country, but that she returned here on attaining majority with intention to retain and maintain her citizenship.--Perkins _v._ Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939). [6] 169 U.S. 682. [7] In re Look Tin Sing, 21 F. 905 (1884). [8] Lam Mow _v._ Nagle, 24 F. (2d) 316 (1928). [9] United States _v._ Gordon, Fed. Cas. No. 15,231 (1861). The term, United States, is defined in the recently enacted Immigration and Nationality Act as follows: "The term, 'United States', except as otherwise specifically herein provided, when used in a geographical sense, means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands of the United States." 66 Stat. 165, Sec. 101 (38). Whether the expression is used in the same sense in Amendment XIV may be questionable. [10] Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 74 (1873). [11] Arver _v._ United States (Selective Draft Law Cases), 245 U.S. 366, 377, 388-389 (1918). [12] Insurance Co. _v._ New Orleans, Fed. Cas. No. 7,052 (1870).--Not being citizens of the United States, corporations accordingly have been declared unable "to claim the protection of that clause of the Fourteenth Amendment which secures the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States against abridgment or impairment by the law of a State."--Orient Ins. Co. _v._ Daggs, 172 U.S. 557, 561 (1899). This conclusion was in harmony with the earlier holding in Paul _v._ Virginia, 8 Wall. 168 (1869) to the effect that corporations were not within the scope of the privileges and immunities clause of state citizenship set out in article 4, section 2. _See also_ Selover, Bates & Co. _v._ Walsh, 226 U.S. 112, 126 (1912); Berea College _v._ Kentucky, 211 U.S. 45 (1908); Liberty Warehouse Co. _v._ Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-op. Marketing Asso., 276 U.S. 71, 89 (1928); Grosjean _v._ American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 244 (1936). [13] 16 Wall. 36, 71, 77-79 (1873). [14] Ibid. 78-79. [15] Ibid. 79, citing Crandall _v._ Nevada, 6 Wall. 35 (1868). Decided before ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. [16] 211 U.S. 78, 97. [17] Crandall _v._ Nevada, 6 Wall. 35 (1868). This case has been cited as supporting the claim that "the right to pass freely from State to State" is "among the rights and privi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271  
1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

United

 
citizenship
 

Amendment

 

clause

 

citizens

 

Fourteenth

 
corporations
 

privileges

 

immunities


Nevada

 

Crandall

 

ratification

 

Orient

 
holding
 

Virginia

 

earlier

 

harmony

 

conclusion

 

unable


protection

 

freely

 
declared
 
rights
 
secures
 

impairment

 
supporting
 

abridgment

 
effect
 
Liberty

Kentucky
 

Warehouse

 
Burley
 
American
 

Marketing

 

Tobacco

 
Growers
 
College
 

article

 
section

Decided

 

Grosjean

 

citing

 

Selover

 

Gordon

 

defined

 
recently
 

Perkins

 
maintain
 

Sweden