FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857  
858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   >>   >|  
ut the militia in case of insurrection against the government of any State. It followed, said Taney, that the President "must, of necessity, decide which is the government, and which party is unlawfully arrayed against it, before he can perform the duty imposed upon him by the act of Congress"[289] and that his determination was not subject to review by the courts. DECLINE IN IMPORTANCE OF THIS GUARANTY With the recognition in the Debs Case[290] of the power and duty of the Federal Government to use "the entire strength of the Nation * * * to enforce in any part of the land the full and free exercise of all national powers and the security of all rights entrusted by the Constitution to its care,"[291] this clause has declined in importance. When that Government finds it necessary or desirable to use force to quell domestic violence, its power to protect the property of the United States, to remove obstructions to the United States mails, or to protect interstate commerce from interruption by labor disputes or otherwise, usually will furnish legal warrant for its action, without reference to this provision.[292] Notes [1] Clark _v._ Graham, 6 Wheat. 577 (1821), is an early case in which the Supreme Court enforced this rule. [2] Stat. 122 (1790); 2 Stat. 299 (1804), R.S. Sec. 905 28 U.S.C. Sec. 687. [3] Mankin _v._ Chandler & Co., 2 Brock. 125, 127 (1823). [4] 7 Cr. 481 (1813). _See_ also Everett _v._ Everett, 215 U.S. 203 (1909); Mutual L. Ins. Co. _v._ Harris, 97 U.S. 331 (1878). [5] On the same basis, a judgment cannot be impeached either in or out of the State by showing that it was based on a mistake of law. American Exp. Co. _v._ Mullins, 212 U.S. 311, 312 (1909); Fauntleroy _v._ Lum, 210 U.S. 230 (1908); Hartford L. Ins. Co. _v._ Barber, 245 U.S. 146 (1917); Hartford L. Ins. Co. _v._ Ibs, 237 U.S. 662 (1915). [6] 3 Wheat. 234 (1818). [7] 13 Pet. 312 (1839). _See also_ Bacon _v._ Howard, 20 How. 22, 25 (1858); Bank of Ala. _v._ Dalton, 9 How. 522, 528 (1850); Great Western Telegraph Co. _v._ Purdy, 162 U.S. 329 (1896); Christmas _v._ Russell, 5 Wall. 290, 301 (1866); Wisconsin _v._ Pelican Insurance Co., 127 U.S. 265, 292 (1888). [8] Cole _v._ Cunningham, 133 U.S. 107, 112 (1890). _See also_ Stacy _v._ Thrasher, use of Sellers, 6 How. 44, 61 (1848); Milwaukee County _v._ White (M.E.) Co., 296 U.S. 268 (1935). [9] Chicago & A.R. Co. _v._ Wiggins Ferry Co., 119 U.S. 615, 622 (1887); Han
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857  
858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

protect

 

Government

 
Hartford
 

States

 

United

 

government

 

Everett

 
Fauntleroy
 

Mullins

 

American


Barber

 

mistake

 

Harris

 

Mutual

 
judgment
 

showing

 

impeached

 

Cunningham

 

Insurance

 

Russell


Pelican

 

Wisconsin

 
County
 
Milwaukee
 
Thrasher
 

Sellers

 
Christmas
 

Howard

 
Wiggins
 
Telegraph

Western
 

Chicago

 
Dalton
 
recognition
 

entire

 

Federal

 
GUARANTY
 
DECLINE
 

courts

 
IMPORTANCE

strength

 

Nation

 

security

 

powers

 

rights

 

entrusted

 
Constitution
 

national

 
exercise
 

enforce