U.S. 141 (1907).
[32] Grover & B. Sewing-Mach. Co. _v._ Radcliffe, 137 U.S. 287 (1890).
_See also_ Brown _v._ Fletcher, 210 U.S. 82 (1908); Galpin _v._ Page, 18
Wall. 350 (1874); Old Wayne Mutual Life Asso. Co. _v._ McDonough, 204
U.S. 8 (1907).
[33] Reynolds _v._ Stockton, 140 U.S. 254 (1891).
[34] Renaud _v._ Abbott, 116 U.S. 277 (1886); Jaster _v._ Currie, 198
U.S. 144 (1905).
[35] Milliken _v._ Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 463 (1940).
[36] Adam _v._ Saenger, 303 U.S. 59, 62 (1938).
[37] Hancock National Bank _v._ Farnum, 176 U.S. 640 (1900).
[38] Stacy _v._ Thrasher, use of Sellers, 6 How. 44, 58 (1848).
[39] Bigelow _v._ Old Dominion Copper Min. & S. Co., 225 U.S. 111
(1912).
[40] 18 How. 404 (1856).
[41] To the same effect is Connecticut Mut. Ins. Co. _v._ Spratley, 172
U.S. 602 (1899).
[42] Simon _v._ Southern Ky., 236 U.S. 115 (1915).
[43] Goldey _v._ Morning News, 156 U.S. 518 (1895); Riverside Mills _v._
Menefee, 237 U.S. 189 (1915).
[44] International Harvester Co. _v._ Kentucky, 234 U.S. 579 (1914);
Riverside Mills _v._ Menefee, 237 U.S. 189 (1915).
[45] International Harvester Co. _v._ Kentucky, 234 U.S. 579 (1914).
[46] Kane _v._ New Jersey, 242 U.S. 160 (1916); Hess _v._ Pawloski, 274
U.S. 352 (1927). Limited in Wuchter _v._ Pizzutti, 276 U.S. 13 (1928).
[47] 18 Wall. 457 (1874).
[48] _See_ 1 Black, Judgments Sec. 246 (1891).
[49] _See also_ Simmons _v._ Saul, 138 U.S. 439, 448 (1891). In other
words, the challenge to jurisdiction is treated as equivalent to the
plea _nul tiel record_, a plea which was recognized even in Mills _v._
Duryee as always available against an attempted invocation of the full
faith and credit clause. What is not pointed out by the Court, is that
it was also assumed in the earlier case that such a plea could always be
rebutted by producing a transcript, properly authenticated in accordance
with the act of Congress, of the judgment in the original case. _See
also_ Brown _v._ Fletcher, 210 U.S. 82 (1908); German Savings Society
_v._ Dormitzer, 192 U.S. 125, 128 (1904); Grover & Sewing-Mach. Co. _v._
Radcliffe, 137 U.S. 287, 294 (1890).
[50] Cheever _v._ Wilson, 9 Wall. 108 (1870).
[51] Andrews _v._ Andrews, 188 U.S. 14 (1903). _See also_ German Savings
Society _v._ Dormitzer, 192 U.S. 125 (1904).
[52] 201 U.S. 562 (1906). _See also_ Thompson _v._ Thompson, 226 U.S.
551 (1913).
[53] 181 U.S. 155, 162 (1901).
[54] 317 U.S. 287 (1942); 325 U
|