FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895  
896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   >>   >|  
tended as a restraint on State interference with federal instrumentalities. Conversely, the Court's recent return to Marshall's conception of the powers of Congress has coincided with a retreat from the more extreme positions taken in reliance upon McCulloch _v._ Maryland. Today the application of the supremacy clause is becoming, to an ever increasing degree, a matter of statutory interpretation--a determination of whether State regulations can be reconciled with the language and policy of federal enactments. In the field of taxation, the Court has all but wiped out the private immunities previously implied from the Constitution without explicit legislative command. Broadly speaking, the immunity which remains is limited to activities of the Government itself, and to that which is explicitly created by statute, e.g., that granted to federal securities and to fiscal institutions chartered by Congress. But the term, activities, will be broadly construed. Clause 3. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. Oath of Office POWER OF CONGRESS IN RESPECT TO OATHS Congress may require no other oath of fidelity to the Constitution, but it may superadd to this oath such other oath of office as its wisdom may require.[106] It may not, however, prescribe a test oath as a qualification for holding office, such an act being in effect an _ex post facto_ law;[107] and the same rule holds in the case of the States.[108] NATIONAL DUTIES OF STATE OFFICERS Commenting in The Federalist No. 27 on the requirement that State officers, as well as members of the State legislatures, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution, Hamilton wrote: "Thus the legislatures, courts, and magistrates, of the respective members, will be incorporated into the operations of the national government _as far as its just and constitutional authority extends_; and it will be rendered auxiliary to the enforcement of its laws." The younger Pinckney had expressed the same idea on the floor of the Philadelphia Convention: "They [the States] are the instruments upon which the Union must fre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895  
896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

Constitution

 
Congress
 

federal

 

activities

 

legislatures

 

members

 
office
 

Office

 

support


require

 

United

 

effect

 

holding

 
NATIONAL
 

DUTIES

 

interference

 

qualification

 

superadd

 

RESPECT


fidelity

 

Marshall

 
return
 
recent
 
Conversely
 

OFFICERS

 
prescribe
 

instrumentalities

 
wisdom
 
conception

Federalist
 

younger

 
Pinckney
 
enforcement
 

auxiliary

 

constitutional

 
authority
 
extends
 

rendered

 
expressed

instruments

 

Philadelphia

 

Convention

 

restraint

 

tended

 

affirmation

 
officers
 

requirement

 
CONGRESS
 

Hamilton