fg. Co., 252 U.S. 60 (1920).
[145] La Tourette _v._ McMaster, 248 U.S. 465 (1919); Douglas _v._ New
York, N.H. & H.R. Co., 279 U.S. 377 (1929); _cf._ Maxwell _v._ Bugbee,
250 U.S. 525 (1919).
[146] United States _v._ Harris, 106 U.S. 629, 643 (1883). _See also_
Baldwin _v._ Franks, 120 U.S. 678 (1887).
[147] United States _v._ Wheeler, 254 U.S. 281 (1920).
[148] Scott _v._ Sandford, 19 How. 393 (1857)
[149] Ibid. 403-411.
[150] Ibid. 572-590.
[151] 13 Pet. 519 (1939).
[152] Ibid. 586.
[153] 8 Wall. 168 (1869).
[154] Ibid. 181.
[155] Crutcher _v._ Kentucky, 141 U.S. 47 (1891). _See also_ pp.
193-198, 1049-1056.
[156] Hemphill _v._ Orloff, 277 U.S. 537 (1928).
[157] 6 Fed. Cas. No. 3,230, 546, 550 (1823).
[158] Ibid. 551-522.
[159] Ibid. 552.
[160] Corfield _v._ Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. No. 3230, 546, 552 (1823).
[161] Ibid. 552.
[162] 94 U.S. 391 (1877).
[163] 161 U.S. 519 (1896).
[164] 209 U.S. 349 (1908).
[165] 334 U.S. 385 (1948).
[166] Ibid. 403. In Mullaney _v._ Anderson, 342 U.S. 415 (1952) an
Alaska statute providing for the licensing of commercial fishermen in
territorial waters and levying a license fee of $50.00 on nonresident
and only $5.00 on resident fishermen was held void under Art. IV,
Sec. 2 on the authority of Toomer _v._ Witsell, cited above.
[167] 172 U.S. 239 (1898).
[168] Ibid. 256.
[169] La Tourette _v._ McMaster, 248 U.S. 465 (1919).
[170] Doherty and Co. _v._ Goodman, 294 U.S. 623 (1935).
[171] Hess _v._ Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352, 356 (1927).
[172] Ferry _v._ Spokane P. & S.R. Co., 258 U.S. 314 (1922), followed in
Ferry _v._ Corbett, 258 U.S. 609 (1922).
[173] Conner _v._ Elliott, 18 How. 591, 593 (1856).
[174] Blake _v._ McClung, 172 U.S. 230, 248 (1898).
[175] Williams _v._ Bruffy, 96 U.S. 176, 184 (1878).
[176] Chambers _v._ Baltimore & O.R. Co., 207 U.S. 142, 148 (1907);
McKnett _v._ St. Louis & S.F.R. Co., 292 U.S. 230, 233 (1934); Miles
_v._ Illinois C.R. Co., 315 U.S. 698, 704 (1942).
[177] Canadian N.R. Co. _v._ Eggen, 252 U.S. 553 (1920).
[178] Ibid. 563.
[179] Chemung Canal Bank _v._ Lowery, 93 U.S. 72, 76 (1876).
[180] Douglas _v._ New York, N.H. & H.R. Co., 279 U.S. 377 (1929).
[181] Chambers _v._ Baltimore & O.R. Co., 207 U.S. 142 (1907).
[182] 12 Wall. 418, 424 (1871). _See also_ Downham _v._ Alexandria, 10
Wall. 173, 175 (1870).
[183] Chalker _v._ Birmingham & M.W.R. Co., 249 U.S. 522 (1919).
[1
|