FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866  
867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   >>   >|  
n Ins. Co., 127 U.S. 265 (1888). [92] 146 U.S. 657 (1892). _See also_ Dennick _v._ R.R. 103 U.S. 11 (1881). [93] Milwaukee County _v._ White (N.E.) Co., 296 U.S. 268 (1935). _See also_ Moore _v._ Mitchell, 281 U.S. 18 (1930). [94] Bank of Augusta _v._ Earle, 13 Pet. 519, 589-596 (1839). _See_ Kryger _v._ Wilson, 242 U.S. 171 (1916); Bond _v._ Hume, 243 U.S. 15 (1917). [95] 19 How. 393, 460 (1857); Bonaparte _v._ Tax Court, 104 U.S. 592 (1882), where it was held that a law exempting from taxation certain bonds of the enacting State did not operate extraterritorially by virtue of the full faith and credit clause. [96] Chicago & Alton R. Co. _v._ Wiggins Ferry, 119 U.S. 615, 622 (1887). [97] Smithsonian Institution _v._ St. John, 214 U.S. 19 (1909). When, in a State court, the validity of an act of the legislature of another State is not in question, and the controversy turns merely upon its interpretation or construction, no question arises under the full faith and credit clause. _See also_ Western Life Indemnity Co. _v._ Rupp, 235 U.S. 261 (1914), citing Glenn _v._ Garth, 147 U.S. 360 (1893); Lloyd _v._ Matthews, 155 U.S. 222, 227 (1894); Banholzer _v._ New York L. Ins. Co., 178 U.S. 402 (1900); Allen _v._ Alleghany Co., 196 U.S. 458, 465 (1905); Texas & N.O.R. Co. _v._ Miller, 221 U.S. 408 (1911). _See also_ National Mut. Bldg. & Loan Asso. _v._ Brahan, 193 U.S. 635 (1904); Johnson _v._ New York Life Ins. Co., 187 U.S. 491, 495 (1903); Pennsylvania F. Ins. Co. _v._ Gold Issue Min. & Mill. Co., 243 U.S. 93 (1917). [98] Alaska Packers Asso. _v._ Industrial Acci. Commission, 294 U.S. 532 (1935); Bradford Electric Light Co. _v._ Clapper, 286 U.S. 145 (1932). [99] Dennick _v._ R.R., 103 U.S. 11 (1881) was the first of the so-called "Death Act" cases to reach the Supreme Court. _See also_ Stewart _v._ B.& O.R. Co., 168 U.S. 445 (1897). Even today the obligation of a State to furnish a forum for the determination of death claims arising in another State under the laws thereof appears to rest on a rather precarious basis. In Hughes _v._ Fetter, 341 U.S. 609 (1951), the Court, by a narrow majority, held invalid under the full faith and credit clause a statute of Wisconsin which, as locally interpreted, forbade its courts to entertain suits of this nature; and in First National Bank _v._ United Air Lines, 342 U.S. 396 (1952), a like result was reached as to an Illinois statute. In both cases the same four Justi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866  
867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

credit

 

clause

 
statute
 

Dennick

 

question

 

National

 

Commission

 
called
 

Bradford

 

Electric


Clapper

 

Brahan

 

Miller

 

Packers

 
Alaska
 

Johnson

 

Pennsylvania

 

Industrial

 

courts

 

forbade


entertain

 

nature

 
interpreted
 
locally
 
majority
 

narrow

 
invalid
 

Wisconsin

 
United
 
Illinois

reached
 

result

 
Alleghany
 
obligation
 

furnish

 

Supreme

 
Stewart
 
determination
 

precarious

 
Hughes

Fetter

 

arising

 

claims

 

thereof

 

appears

 

Bonaparte

 
Wilson
 

taxation

 
enacting
 

exempting