FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503  
2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   >>   >|  
urdity in saying, with this learned "Professor of Languages," that the pronouns of the different persons _are_ those persons: as, "_I is the first person_, and denotes the speaker. _Thou is the second_, and denotes the person spoken to."--_Ib._, p. 22. [386] (1.) Concerning the verb _need_, Dr. Webster has the following note: "In the use of this verb there is another irregularity, which is peculiar, the verb being _without a nominative_, expressed or implied. 'Whereof here _needs_ no account.'--_Milt., P. L._, 4. 235. There is no evidence of the fact, and there _needs_ none. This is an established use of _need_."--_Philos. Gram._, p. 178; _Improved Gram._, 127; _Greenleaf's Gram. Simp._, p. 38; _Fowler's E. Gram._, p. 537. "Established use?" To be sure, it is "an established use;" but the learned Doctor's comment is a most unconscionable blunder,--a pedantic violation of a sure principle of Universal Grammar,--a perversion worthy only of the veriest ignoramus. Yet Greenleaf profitably publishes it, with other plagiarisms, for "Grammar Simplified!" Now the verb "_needs_," like the Latin _eget_, signifying _is necessary_, is here not active, but neuter; and has the nominative set _after it_, as any verb must, when the adverb _there_ or _here_ is before it. The verbs _lack_ and _want_ may have the same construction, and can have no other, when the word _there_, and not a nominative, precedes them; as, "Peradventure _there shall lack five_ of the fifty righteous."--_Gen._, xviii, 28. There is therefore neither "_irregularity_," nor any thing "_peculiar_," in thus placing the verb and its nominative. (2.) Yet have we other grammarians, who, with astonishing facility, have allowed themselves to be misled, and whose books are now misleading the schools, in regard to this very simple matter. Thus Wells: "The _transitive_ verbs _need_ and _want_, are sometimes employed in a general sense, _without a nominative_, expressed or implied. Examples:--'There _needed_ a new dispensation.'--_Caleb Cushing_. 'There _needs_ no better picture.'--_Irving_. 'There _wanted_ not patrons to stand up.'--_Sparks_. 'Nor did there _want_ Cornice, or frieze.'--_Milton_."--_Wells's School Gram._, 1st Ed., p. 141: 113th Ed., p. 154. In my edition of Milton, the text is, "Nor did _they want_ Cornice or frieze."--_P. L._, B. i, l. 715, 716. This reading makes _want_ a "transitive" verb, but the other makes it neuter, with the nominative following it. Ag
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2479   2480   2481   2482   2483   2484   2485   2486   2487   2488   2489   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503  
2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514   2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

nominative

 

expressed

 

implied

 

Grammar

 

transitive

 
Greenleaf
 

established

 

peculiar

 

neuter

 

learned


persons

 

denotes

 
person
 

Cornice

 
frieze
 

irregularity

 

Milton

 
facility
 
astonishing
 

allowed


misled

 

precedes

 

Peradventure

 

righteous

 

placing

 

grammarians

 
Cushing
 
School
 

Sparks

 

edition


reading

 

patrons

 

wanted

 

employed

 
general
 

matter

 

simple

 
schools
 

regard

 

Examples


picture

 

Irving

 
needed
 

dispensation

 

misleading

 

publishes

 

Whereof

 

account

 

Webster

 

Improved