FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514  
2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   >>   >|  
ecedent is '_belonging_,' and the Consequent, '_him alone.'"--Ib._, p. 126. My solution, in either case, differs from this in scarcely any thing else than the _choice of words_ to express it. (4.) It appears that, in sundry dialects of the north of Europe, the preposition _at_ has been preferred for the governing of the infinitive: "The use of _at_ for _to_, as the sign of the infinitive mode, is Norse, not Saxon. It is the regular prefix in Icelandic, Danish, Swedish, and Feroic. It is also found in the northern dialects of the Old English, and in the particular dialect of Westmoreland at the present day."--_Fowler, on the English Language_, 8vo, 1850, p. 46. [407] Here is a literal version, in which two infinitives are governed by the preposition _between_; and though such a construction is uncommon, I know not why it should be thought less accurate in the one language than in the other. In some exceptive phrases, also, it seems not improper to put the infinitive after some other preposition than _to_; as, "What can she do _besides sing_?"--"What has she done, _except rock_ herself?" But such expressions, if allowable, are too unfrequent to be noticed in any general Rule of syntax. In the following example, the word _of_ pretty evidently governs the infinitive: "Intemperance characterizes our discussions, that is calculated to embitter in stead _of conciliate_."--CINCINNATI HERALD: _Liberator_, No. 986. [408] This doctrine has been lately revived in English by William B. Fowle, who quotes Dr. Rees, Beauzee, Harris, Tracy, and Crombie, as his authorities for it. He is right in supposing the English infinitive to be generally governed by the preposition _to_, but wrong in calling it a _noun_, or "the _name_ of the verb," except this phrase be used in the sense in which every verb may be the name of itself. It is an error too, to suppose with Beauzee, "that the infinitive never in any language _refers to a subject_ or nominative;" or, as Harris has it, that infinitives "_have no reference at all to persons or substances_." See _Fowle's True English Gram._, Part ii, pp. 74 and 75. For though the infinitive verb never _agrees_ with a subject or nominative, like a finite verb, it most commonly has a very obvious _reference_ to something which is _the subject_ of the being, action, or passion, which it expresses; and this reference is one of the chief points of difference between the infinitive and a noun. S. S. Greene,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2490   2491   2492   2493   2494   2495   2496   2497   2498   2499   2500   2501   2502   2503   2504   2505   2506   2507   2508   2509   2510   2511   2512   2513   2514  
2515   2516   2517   2518   2519   2520   2521   2522   2523   2524   2525   2526   2527   2528   2529   2530   2531   2532   2533   2534   2535   2536   2537   2538   2539   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

infinitive

 

English

 
preposition
 

reference

 

subject

 

governed

 

infinitives

 

Harris

 

nominative

 

Beauzee


language
 

dialects

 
generally
 

supposing

 

authorities

 

Crombie

 

calling

 

phrase

 

solution

 

Liberator


HERALD
 

CINCINNATI

 

calculated

 

embitter

 

conciliate

 

doctrine

 

quotes

 

differs

 
revived
 
William

finite

 
commonly
 

agrees

 

obvious

 

points

 
difference
 
ecedent
 

Greene

 
expresses
 
action

passion

 
refers
 
Consequent
 

discussions

 
suppose
 
belonging
 

persons

 

substances

 
characterizes
 

literal